Translate

viernes, 29 de noviembre de 2024

Proyectos publicados en el Web

 Proyectos Musicales o Cancioneros

Estos proyectos musicales se desarrollaron utilizando la inteligencia artificial y la herramienta de SUNO.


  1.  A Piece of Heavenhttps://apieceofheavenfunmusicologist.blogspot.com/
  2.  Navidad en Familia https://navidadenfamilia-fun-musicologist.blogspot.com/
  3. Nacidos para Amar  https://nacidosporamor.blogspot.com/
  4. Lullabies to my Precious Gift from Heaven https://llulabiestomypreciousgiftfromheaven.blogspot.com/
  5. El Navegante Fugitivo https://nevagantefugitivo-funmusicologist590.blogspot.com/
  6. Galería Musical https://lchvmusicologist.blogspot.com/
  7. Travesía a Nuestro Destino https://cancionerofunmusicologist-tnd.blogspot.com/
  8. Happy Holiday, It´s Christmas https://happyholidaysischristmas.blogspot.com/
  9. Christmas Spirit of Rejoice https://christmas-spirit-of-rejoice.blogspot.com/


Proyectos Relacionado con las Artes Culinarias

  1. Flan https://flanpostrelatinoamericano.blogspot.com/2024/11/
  2. Pescados y Mariscos para las Fiestas https://pescadosymariscosparalasfiestas.blogspot.com/
  3. Recetario de Mantecados y Sorbetes https://recetariodemantecadosysorbetes.blogspot.com/
  4. Bebidas para el Sport Bar https://bebidasparaelsportbardelrestaurante.blogspot.com/
  5. Pastas  https://pastas2023.blogspot.com/
  6. Recetario Familiar de Lydia https://recetariofamiliardelydia.blogspot.com/

Proyectos Educativos 

  1. Tarjetas Didácticas para una Vida Saludable y en Armonía con el Ambiente https://tdvsa-con-el-ambiente.blogspot.com/
  2. Programación Curricular Pre Kinder y Kinder CDDHA https://csa-preschool-self-sufficient-program.blogspot.com/
  3. Mi Caja de Herramienta Educativa https://micajadeherramientaeducativa.blogspot.com/
  4. Cometas Listos para Aprender a Ser Autosuficientes https://cometaslistosparaaprender.blogspot.com/
  5. Pensamiento Creativo para Desarrollar la Autosuficiencia https://pensamientocreativoautosuficiente.blogspot.com/
  6. Troubleshooting for Disorders https://troubleshootingfordisorders.blogspot.com/

viernes, 16 de agosto de 2024

Curriculums Design Examples


  1. Aprendamos sobre los Desastres Naturales

2. Summer Fun School Program



3.. Teatro de Marionetas


4. Magnetísmo y Electricidad


5. Minerales y Recursos de Nuestro Planeta




6. Los Anfibios: Un eslabon entre lo acuático y lo terrestre




7. De la Revolución Industrial hacia la Globalización



8. Conozcamos a los Protistas





9. Oceanography for students living in coastal areas



miércoles, 10 de mayo de 2023

Artículos de Revistas Profesionales que he leído para mi desarrollo profesional

 



Metacognition

  1. Thinking about Thinking: Metacognition. The Learning Classroom. Session 9 p. 157-170. Developed by Linda Darling-Hammong, Kim Austin, Melissa Cheung, and Daisy Martin with Contributions from Bridid Barron, Annmarie Palincsar and Lee Shulman. Stanford University School of Education.

  2. The Use of Vee Diagram With Third Graders As a Metacognitive Tool for Learning Science Concepts.  Department of Teaching and Learning.  Teaching and Learning Presentations Tennessee State University 2007  Marino C. Alvarez and Victoria J. Risko

  3. Children´s Understanding of the Stream of Consciousness. Child Development, 1993 vol 64 pp. 387-398.  John H. Flavell, Frances L. Green. Eleanor R. Flavell

  4. Development of Children´s Understanding of Connections Between Thinking and Feeling.  Psychological Science September 2001. vol 12 No 1 p. 430-432. John H. Flavell, Eleanor R. Flavell, and Frances L. Green

  5. On Cognitive Development. Presidential Address Society for Research in Child Development. Boston, Massachusetts April 2-5, 1981.  John H. Flavell

  6. Theory of Mind Development: Retrospect and Prospect.  Merril-Palmer Quarterly, Vol 50 No. 3. pp. 274-290 John H. Flavell

  7. Metacognitive Strategies in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics.  Pythagoras Dec 2009 vol 70, p.57-67.  Stephan du Toit, Gary Kotze

  8. A Mediate Cognitive Program to Increase the Critical Reasoning and Reading Competencies of College Undergraduates and Pre-Collegiate Learners. Northeastern Illinois University, Reading Department. 1984. Report. Descriptive. ERIC. ED266407.  Theresa Booker

  9. An Analysis of research on metacognitive teaching strategies.  Procedia Social and Behavior Sciences. 5th World Conference on Educational Science-WCES 2013. Arthur K. Ellis, David W. Denton, John B. Bond.

  10. Curriculum Evaluation.  International Research Journal, September 2010. Vol 1 Issue 12.  ISSN 0975-3486 Dr. Amrut J. Bharvad. 

  11. Development of metacognitive behavior of future teacher students through electronic learning diaries as means of self-reflection.  Procedia Computer Science. 2010  www. sciencedirect.com. ISSN 1877-0509 Catalin-Gosmin Glava, Adina-Elena Glava,

  12. Cross-Country Generalizability of the Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Students´ Strategy Use and Reading Competence.  Teacher College Record.  The Voice of Scholarship in Education. Jan 2015. Vol 117 No. 1 Cordula Artelt and Wolfgang Schneider.

  13. Cognitions About Cognitions: The Theory of Metacognition.  Prescott Lecky Nov 2007.  Lecturer, Farook Training College, Calicut, Kerala, India. 20/07/2008. p. 1-23.  Noushad P P.

  14. Thinking about Thinking: Developing Metacognition in Children. Early Child Development and Care. 1998. Vol 141 pp. 1-5.  Recuperado 19 de junio de 2017.  Robert Fisher.

  15. The Role of Metacognitive Skills in Developing Critical Thinking.  Metacognition Learning (2010) Vol 5.  137-156.  DOI 10.1007/s. Springer.  Carlo Magno.

  16. Goodwin, B. (2014, April), Teach Critical Thinking to Teach Writing.  Teach Critical Thinking with Metacognitive Regulation. Educational Leadership, 78-80.  Retrieved from www.ASCD.org.

  17. Gómez Reyes, A., & Flores Samaniego, A. (2012). Bitácora como Instrumento Metacognitivo de Evaluación.  Congreso Internacional de la Educación (pp. 1-18).  México: UNAM.

  18. Gibson, A. Kitto, K & Bruza, P. (2016).  Towards the Discovery of Learner Metacognition from Reflective Writing.  Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(2), p. 22.36.

  19. Díaz, Itala. (2015, January-June).  Training in Metacognitive Strategies for Students´ Vocabulary Improvement by Using Learning Journals.  Profile, 17 (1), 87-102.

  20. Clipa, O., Ignat, A-A., & Stanciu, M (2012).  Learning diary as a tool for metacognitive strategies development.  Procedia Social and Behavioral, 2012 Vol 33 905-909.  Retrieved September 2017.

  21. Smith, K. S., Rook, J. E. & Smith, T. W. (2007).  Increasing Student Engagement Using Effective and Metacognitive Writing Strategies in Content Areas.  Preventing School Failure, 51(3), 43-48.

  22. Experiential Learning, Spacila Visualization, and Metacognition: An Excessive with the Blank Page Technique for Learning Anatomy.  Health Professions Education,  Vol 2, Issue 1, June 2016 pp. 51-57.  Helen L. Naug, Natalie J. Colson, Daniel Donner.

  23. Increasing Student Engagement Using Effective and Metacognitive Writing Strategies in Content Areas.  Preventing School Failure.  Spring 2007. 51 (3).  pp. 43-48.  Karen S. Smith, Johan Erik Rook, Thomas W. Smith.

  24. Hacia una coceptualización de la metacognición y su ambito de desarrollo.  Horizontes Educacionales. 2002.  vol 7. pp. 58-63.  M.E. Correa, F. Castro Rubilar y H. Lira Ramos.  Recuperado el 7 de dicimebre de 2015.

  25. The Role of Metacognitive Skills in Developing Critical Thinking.  Metacognition Learning (2010) Vol 5.  137-156.  DOI 10.1007/s. Springer.  Carlo Magno.

  26. Thinking about Thinking: Developing Metacognition in Children. Early Child Development and Care. 1998. Vol 141 pp. 1-5.  Recuperado 19 de junio de 2017.  Robert Fisher.

  27. Goodwin, B. (2014, April), Teach Critical Thinking to Teach Writing.  Teach Critical Thinking with Metacognitive Regulation. Educational Leadership, 78-80.  Retrieved from www.ASCD.org.

  28.  Gómez Reyes, A., & Flores Samaniego, A. (2012). Bitácora como Instrumento Metacognitivo de Evaluación.  Congreso Internacional de la Educación (pp. 1-18).  México: UNAM.

  29. Gibson, A. Kitto, K & Bruza, P. (2016).  Towards the Discovery of Learner Metacognition from Reflective Writing.  Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(2), p. 22.36.

  30. Díaz, Itala. (2015, January-June).  Training in Metacognitive Strategies for Students´ Vocabulary Improvement by Using Learning Journals.  Profile, 17 (1), 87-102.

  31.  Clipa, O., Ignat, A-A., & Stanciu, M (2012).  Learning diary as a tool for metacognitive strategies development.  Procedia Social and Behavioral, 2012 Vol 33 905-909.  Retrieved September 2017.

  32. Smith, K. S., Rook, J. E. & Smith, T. W. (2007).  Increasing Student Engagement Using Effective and Metacognitive Writing Strategies in Content Areas.  Preventing School Failure, 51(3), 43-48.

  33. Experiential Learning, Spacila Visualization, and Metacognition: An Excessive with the Blank Page Technique for Learning Anatomy.  Health Professions Education,  Vol 2, Issue 1, June 2016 pp. 51-57.  Helen L. Naug, Natalie J. Colson, Daniel Donner.

  34. Increasing Student Engagement Using Effective and Metacognitive Writing Strategies in Content Areas.  Preventing School Failure.  Spring 2007. 51 (3).  pp. 43-48.  Karen S. Smith, Johan Erik Rook, Thomas W. Smith.

  35. Hacia una coceptualización de la metacognición y su ambito de desarrollo.  Horizontes Educacionales. 2002.  vol 7. pp. 58-63.  M.E. Correa, F. Castro Rubilar y H. Lira Ramos.  Recuperado el 7 de dicimebre de 2015.

  36. Conciencia y Metacognición. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana. 2005. Vol 23. pp 77-89. ISSN: 1794-4724.  Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia,  Pedro Organista Díaz.
  37.  The Effect of Instructing Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies on the Academic Progress of Ilam Medical University Students.  Psychological Research  October 2011.  1 (4), 244-250. Retrieved on January 9, 2017.  ISSN 2159-5542Abdolhosseini, A, Keikhavani, S, Mohammadi Hasel, K.
  38. An Analysis of the Effects of Integrated Instruction of Metacognitive and Study Skills Upon the Self Efficacy and Achievement of Male and Females Students.  April 2020.  p. 1-63. Miami University, Ohio Dissertation/Thesis (040).  Barbara Ann Higgins
  39. Improving Exam Performance by Metacognitive Strategies.  Psychology Learning and Teaching, Vol 11 (2) 2012.  Andrew Johnson, John Smyers, and Rebekah Purvis.  DOI. 10.2304/plat.2012.11.2.180

  40.  Improving Students´ problem-solving in a virtual chemistry simulation through metacognitive messages.  SREE Fall 2011. Conference Abstract Template.  p. B3-B7.  Carole R. Beal & Ronald H. Stevens.
  41. Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology.  Vol 37. No. 2. 2006. Derek Holton & David Clarke. ISSN 0020-739x (Print) 1464-5211 (online).  
  42. Mediación de estrategias metacognitivas mediante la Escala de Conciencia Lectora: ESCOLA.  Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology.  Vol 7(2). 2009. p.779-804. Virginina Jiménez Rodríguez, Aníbal Puentes Ferreras, Jesús Ma. Alvarado Izquierdo, Lorena Arrebillaga Durante.  ISSN: 1696.2095.

  43.  Promoting general metacognitive awareness.  Instructional Science. Vol. 26.  1998. p. 113-125. Gregory Schraw. 

  44. The Influence of Metacognitive Self-Regulation and Ability Levels on Problem-Solving, Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Seattle, WA, April, 10-14, 2001). p.2-11.  Bruce C. Howard, Steven McGee, Regina Shia, Namsoo Hong.
  45.  Why Didn´t think of That? Teacher Influence on Students Metacognitive Knowledge of How to Help Student Acquire Metacognitive Abilities. Kairaranga 2012 Vol 13 No, 1.  Linda Schofield, RTLB Oamaro

  46. Meta-cognitive Strategy Usage and Epistemological Beliefs of Primary School Teacher Trainees.  Educational Sciences, Theory & Practice.  Winter, 2011 vol 11 (1) p. 51-57. S Dilek Belet, Meral Güven. 

  47. The root of Metacognition: An Historical Review.  Dec 86. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference (36th, Autin, TX, Dec 3-6, 1986). p. 1-15.  Maribeth Cassidy Schmitt.

  48. How creative potential is related to metacognition.  European Journal of Education and Psychology. 2013, Vol 6, No. 2 (págs 69-81). ISSN 1888-8992.  María Luisa Sanz de Acedo Lizarraga and María Teresa Sanz de Acedo Baquedano.

  49. Las experiencias metacognitivas, sus estrategias y su relación con las plataformas educativas.  Autonomía y Tecnología.  Ponencia.  Claudia Otake González

  50. Metacognitive Theories.  Educational Psychology Review.  Vol 7.  No. 4, 1995. p.351-371 Gregory Schraw and David Moshman.

  51. An Overview: Metacognition in Education. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Research.  May/June 2014. ISSN 2321-3124  p.529-535.  Recuperado 11 de julio de 2018.  Mohsen Mahdavi

  52. Do Metacognitive Skills and Learning Strategies Transfer Across Domains? Symposium Assessing Metacognitive Knowledge Monitoring,  Chicago, March 1977. ED 410 262 p. 1-22.  Howard T. Everson, Sigmund Tobias, Vytas Laitusis.

  53. Las Estrategias Metacognitivas y su Relación con el Contexto Educativo.  Instituto de Investigaciones en Educación en las Ciencias Experimentales (I.I.E.C.E.) Recuperado 24 de noviembre de 2017. p. 1-8. Claudia Mazzitellu y Carla Maturano

  54. La enseñanza de estrategias metacognitivas para favorecer los procesos intelectuales y las memorias en los adultos mayores.  PUAM.  Programa Universitario de Adulto Mayores. Centro de Investigaciones Gerontológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas.  Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.  L. Tarditi, J. Yuni, C. Urbano.

  55. Exploring the Relationship of Test Anxiety and Metacognition on Reading Test Performance: A Cognitive Analysis.  Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association (100th, Washington, DC, August 14-18, 1992). p. 2-28.  Howard T. Everson.

  56. Literature Review on Metacognition and its Measurement.  Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011 vol 15 3731-3730.  Ahmet Oguz Akturk and Ismail Sahin

  57. Does the Use of Metacognitive Strategies Influence Students' Problem-Solving Skills in Physics? Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) November 2014 Vol 19 No. 11. pp. 48-51.   e-ISSN: 2279-0837  Ali M.C. Shareeja & Abdul K. Gafoor.  

  58. Identification of Students' Metacognition Level in Solving Mathematics Problems about Sequence.  IOSR Journal of Research & Methods in Education (IOSR-JRME).  Nov/Dec 2016, vol 6 No 6 e-ISSN: 2320-7388.  p. 1-7  Danang Setyadi, Subanji, Makbul Muksar.

  59. The Effect of S2RE,  a Metacognitive Learning Strategy, on the Reading Comprehension of Elementary Students. November 93. Annual Meeting of the Mid South Educational Research Association (New Orleans, LA, November 10-12, 1993). p. 1-22.  Gloria D. Campbell-Beal, and Others.

  60. The impact of Metacognitive Instruction on Creative Problem Solving.  Journal of Education, 2015. DOI 10.1080/00220973.2013.876604.  Recuperado 14 de marzo de 2018.  Ryan A. Hargrove.

  61. Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry.  American Psychologist October 1979 Vol 34, No. 10, p. 906-911. Recuperado 2 de julio de 2018. John H. Flavell

  62. Student Perception of Metacognitive Activities in Entry-Level Science Courses.  Natural Science Education.  December 2014 Vol. 43 pp. 25-32.  Leah Sandall, Martha Mamo, Carol Speth, Don Lee, and Timothy Kettler.
  63. Constructive metacognitive activity shift in mathematical problem-solving.  Educational Research and Reviews. 23 April 2016. Vol 11 # 8  p, 656-667. ISSN 1990-3839.  Intan Dwi Hastuti, Toto Nusantara, Subanji, and Hery Susanto.
  64. Metacognición en un proceso de aprendizaje autónomo y cooperativo en el aula universitaria.  Contextos Educativos.  2015. vol 18 p. 95-108.  Alicia Pérez de Albéniz Iturriaga, Elena Escolano Pérez, María Teresa Pascual Sufrate, Beatriz Lucas Molina, Sylvia Sastre i Riba
  65. Metacognition as a means to increase the effectiveness of inquiry-based science education.  Science Education International.  December 2012. Vol 23, No. 4  p. 366-382.  Kanesa D. Seraphin, Joanna Philippoff, Lauren Kaupp and Lisa M. Vallin.
  66. Training for Collaborative Problem Solving: Improving Team Process and Performance through Metacognitive Prompting.  Proceeding of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 58th Annual Meeting. 2014.  Travis J. Wiltshire, Kelly Rosch, Logan Fiorella & Stephen M. Fiore.
  67. Evaluación Conductual de la Función Ejecutiva-Versión Infantil (BRIEF-P, versión española): fiabilidad y validez.  Acta de Investigación Psicológica 7 (2017) 2811-2822.  Esperanza Brusela-Herrera, Tamara Luque-Cuenca.
  68. University Students´ Level of Metacognitive Thinking and their Ability to Solve Problems.  American Journal of Contemporary Research. Vol 5 No. 3 June 2015.  p. 121-134.  Nahil M Aljaberi, Eman Gheith.
  69. To Think without Thinking: The Implications of Combinatory Play and the Creative Process for Neuroaesthetics.  American Journal of Play.  Fall 2014. Vol 7 No. 1.  Victoria Stevens.
  70. Metacognition: Theory and Application for College Readers. Paper presented at the International Reading Association Annual Meeting (30th, New Orleans, LA May 5-9, 1985). JoAnne E. Burley and Others.
  71. Mental fixation and metacognitive predictions of insight in creative problem-solving.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2015 Vol 68, No 4, pp. 802-813. Routledge.  Benjamin C. Storm and Michelle L. Hickman.
  72. Consequence of Increased Self-Regulated Learning Opportunities on Student Teachers´ Learning Opportunities on Student Teachers´ Motivation and Use of Metacognitive Skills.  Australian Journal of Teacher Education. Vol 37 Issue 8.  pp. 102-117.  Emmy Vrieling, Theo Bastiaens, Sjef Stijnen.
  73. The Roots of Metacognition: An Historical Review. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference (36th, Austin, TX, December 3-6, 1986). pp. 1-15 Maribeth Cassidy Schmitt
  74. El desarrollo de la metacognición en Aulas Heterogéneas.  Aulas Heterogéneas. Jornada de Intercambio de experiences 2015
  75. El desarrollo de la metacognición en el Aprendiz de las Ciencias: Estrategias para el Profesor y Actividades Orientadas al Alumno. Investigación Didáctica. Enseñanza de las ciencias, 2000, vol 18 No. 3, p. 369-380. Juan Miguel Campanario.
  76. Metacognition and Critical Thinking. Teacher College Columbia University April 2004 ED 477 930. p. 2-10. David Dean, Deanna Kuhn
  77. Assessing metacognitive knowledge: Development and evaluation of a test instrument. Journal for Educational Research Online. 2003 Vol 5 (2) pp. 162-188. Marion Händel, Cordula Artelt & Sabine Weinert
  78. Metacognnition: An Effective Tool to Promote Succes in College Science Learning. Journal at College Science Teaching. 2014 vol 43 No, 4 p. 48-54 Ningfeng Zhao, Jeffrey G. Wardeska, Saundra Y. McGuire, Elsbieta Cook
  79. Applying learning strategy questionnaires: problems and possibilities. Metacognition Learning (2011) Vol 6, p.91-109 Gonny Schellings.
  80. La metacognición: Una herramienta para promover un ambiente áulico inclusivo para estudiantes con discapacidad. Revista Electrónica Educare. Sept-Dec 2015 vol. 19 No. 3 p. 1-20  Ana Patricia Vazquez Chaves.
  81. Metacognition Modules: A Scaffolded Series of Online Assignments Designed to Improve Students Study Skills. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education. 2017 Vol 18 No. 1. Doi: https: doi.org&10.1128&jmbe.v18ii.1212  Jean A. Cardinales and Bethany C. Johnson
  82. Pupil Culture, Education and the Metacognitive Curriculum. Curriculum Studies. 1994 Vol 2 No. 1 pp. 99-117 ISNN 0965/9757 Recuperado el 8 de marzo de 2018. John Quicke
  83. Metacognition and Classroom Instruction  Reading Horizons January 1987 Article 2 vol 27 Issue 2. Recuperado en Julio 13, 2018.  Mary Ann Wham
  84. La Enseñanza de las Ciencias y el Desarrollo de Destrezas de Pensamiento: Un Estudio Metacognitivo con Alumnos de 7mo de Primaria.  Enseñanza de las Ciencias 2008, 26 (2), p. 211-226.  María Filomena Ribeiro y José Antonio Neto
  85. Metacognition as means to increase the effectiveness of inquiry-based science education. Science Education International. December 2012 Vol 23  No. 4 pp. 366-382.  Kanesa D. Seraphin, Joanna Philippoff, Lauren Kaupp, Lisa M. Vallin.
  86. Developing of Critical Thinking with Metacognitive Regulation.  13th International Conference an Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2016) p. 353-356.  Yasushi Gotoh
  87. The role of metacognitive skills in developing critical thinking. Metacognition Learning 2010 vol 5 pp. 137-156. Carlo Magno




Creativity
  1. Creativity Training in Problem Solving: A Model of Creativity in Mathematics Teacher Education. New Horizon in Education, December 2007 Vol 55, No. 3 pp. 107-114,  Mehmet Ali Kandemer, Hülya Gür.

  2. IBSE and Creativity Development. Science Education International. Vol 25, Issue 1, 2014, 8-18  Eva Trnova

  3. Promoting Creative and Critical Thinking Skills in College Biology.  Bioscene March 2001 Vol 27 (1) p, 13-24.  Anton E. Lawson.

  4. Imagineering in Education: A Framework to Enhance Students´ Learning Performance and Creativity ThinkingEducational Technology January-February 2014. p. 14-19.  Prachyanun Nilsook, Nattakant Utakrit and Judy Clayden.  

  5. A Child´s Consciousness of His Own Creative ProcessOASP Selected Writings, Atlantic Institute of Education, p. 31-52, May 1981.  Halifax, Nova Scotia. Barry Fox. 

  6. Secondary Teachers´ Conceptions of Creative Thinking Within the Context of Environmental Education.  International Journal of Environmental & Science Education.  Vol 7 No. 2 April 2012, p. 269-290. ISNN 1306-3065 María Daskolia, Athanasios Dimos, Panagiotis G. Kamplys.

  7. The Creative Process Entailed in the Co-Construction of Classroom Curriculum.  Critical Questions in Education Volume 4:1. p. 21-29.  Olha Ketsman, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

  8. Creatividad en la ciencia, creatividad de la ciencia. Paradigma. pp. 5-19.  Miguel Ángel Medina Torres.  Profesor Titular de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular de la Universidad de Málaga.

  9. Collaborative Creativity Process in a WIKI; A Study in Secondary Education.  11th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2014). p. 55-62 Manoli Pifarré, Laura Marti and Alex Guijosa

  10. Creativity and Education.  Creativity Education. 2010 Vol 1 No. 3 p.166-169.  DOI:10.4236/ce2010.13026. Robina Shaheen.

  11. Developing Critical and Creative Thinking Strategies in Primary School Pupils: an intercultural study of teachers´ learning.  Journal of In-Service Education  Professional Development in Education. Vol 28 No. 1, pp. 115-134.  ISSN 1747-5082.  David S. Martin, Anna R. Craft, and Harm H. Tillema.

  1. Project CRISS: Evidence of Effectiveness.  January 2004.  Carol M. Santa, Ph.D.  www. projectcriss.com/research.

  2. Introducing Creative in a Design Laboratory for A Freshman Level Electrical and Computer Engineering Course.  American Journal of Engineering Education. June 2014 Vol 5, No. 1.  Susan L. Burkett, Sushma Kotru, John C Lusth, Debra McCallum, Sarah Dunlap.

  3. Supporting Awareness in Creative Group Work by Exposing Design Rationale.  Human Technology. August 2011 Vol 7 (2), p. 123-141  ISSN 1795-6889  Umer Farooq y John M. Carroll

  4. The Value of Teaching Creativity in Adult Education.  International Journal of Higher Education. 2012.  Vol 1. No. 2  pp.84-91.  ISSN 1927-6052.  Kuan Chen Tsai.

  5. Inventing Creativity: An Exploration of the Pedagogy of Ingenuity in Science Classrooms.  School Science and Mathematics. Vol 113 (8) pp.400-409.  Allison       Antink Meyer and Norman G. Lederman.

  6.  El Pensamiento Creativo: El Poder del Pensamiento Lateral para la Creación de Nuevas Ideas. (1994) Barcelona: Paidos Plural.  De Bono, Eduard.

  7. Being a Critical and Creative Thinker: A Balanced Thinking Mode.  Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Science (AJHSS).  Vol 1 (2) August 2013.  p.1-9  Kuan Chen Tsai.  ISSN: 2330-9720.
  8. Supporting Awareness in Creative Group Work by Exposing Design Rationale.  Human Technology. August 2011 Vol 7 (2), p. 123-141  ISSN 1795-6889  Umer Farooq y John M. Carroll

  9. Inventing Creativity: An Exploration of the Pedagogy of Ingenuity in Science Classrooms.  School Science and Mathematics. Vol 113 (8) pp.400-409.  Allison       Antink Meyer and Norman G. Lederman.

  10. The Value of Teaching Creativity in Adult Education.  International Journal of Higher Education. 2012.  Vol 1. No. 2  pp.84-91.  ISSN 1927-6052.  Kuan Chen Tsai.

  11.  Design Creativity!  Learning & Leading with Technology.  December/January 2012-13. p.16-19.  Phyllis Newbill and Liesl Baum.

  12. Introducing Creative in a Design Laboratory for A Freshman Level Electrical and Computer Engineering Course.  American Journal of Engineering Education. June 2014 Vol 5, No. 1.  Susan L. Burkett, Sushma Kotru, John C Lusth, Debra McCallum, Sarah Dunlap.

  13. . Disembodied creativity: The role of action research in moderating educator expectations of marketing and public relations students.  Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice.  Vol 12 Issue 4 TL Forum 2015.  Article 3.  Helen Fordham

  14. Developing Critical and Creative Thinking Strategies in Primary School Pupils: an Intercultural Study of Teachers´ Learning.  Journal of In-Service Education. Routledge.  2002.   Vol 28 No. 1  pp. 115-134. ISSN: 1367: 4587 David S. Martin, Anna R. Craft, Harm H. Tilema. 

  15.  Creativity Training--A Practical Teaching Strategy.  Annual National Conference of the American Council on Rural Special Education (14th, Austin, Texas) Mar 23-23 1994.  Stephen R. Rusell; Joyce Meikamp.

  16. Culture and Creativity: Examining Variations in Divergent Thinking Within Norwegian and Canadian Communities.  Sage.  2015. pp. 1-13.  C. Dishke Hondzel, M. Sorebo Gulliksen.  DOI: 10.1177/2158244015611448.

  17. Resolución de problemas y creatividad: implicaciones para el currículo de ciencias.  Investigación y Experiencia Didácticas.  Enseñanza de las ciencias. 1998.  vol 6 (3), pp. 224-230.  R. M. Garret.

  18. Education which creativity? Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2018. p. 25-32.  Vlad Petre Gläveanu.

  19. Critical Thinking in wiki book creation with enhanced and minimal scaffolds.  Association for Education Communications and Technology.  Springer.  February 2015.  Vol 63 (1). pp.5-33.  Nari Kim.
  20. Infusing Critical and Creative Thinking and Metacognition in ICT Education:  A Classroom Study. International Conference on Information Resources Management.  Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL)  2008.  Anil Sharma, Khalifa Ali Alsuwaidi, Divya Na, Stephen Boylan.
  21. The Effect of Creative and Critical Thinking Based Laboratory Application on Creative and Logical Thinking Abilities of Prospective Teachers.  Asian Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching. June 2009 Vol 10 (1).  Article 2.  Özlem Koray & Mustafa Serdar Köksal.
  22. The Levels of Creative Thinking and Metacognitive Thinking Skills of Intermediate School in Jordan: Survey Study.  Canada Social Science. 2012 Vol 8 No. 4 pp. 52-61. ISSN 1923-6697.  Majed Mohammad AL-Khayat.
  23. The Structure of Creative Cognition in the Human Brain.  Frontier in Human Neuroscience.  July 2013 Vol 7. Article 330. pp. 1-13.  Rex E. Jung, Britanny S. Mead, Jessica Carrasco and Ranee A. Flores.
  24. Grow Creativity!  Learning & Leading with Technology (May 2011) Candance Hackett Shively.
  25. Developing Critical and Creative Thinkers: Toward a Conceptual Model of Creative and Critical Thinking Process.  Educational Technology (Sep-Oct, 2009) 49 (5) p.3-13.  Baum Combs, L., Cennamo, K.S., Leart Newbill, P.

  26. Relation Between Critical and Creative Thinking. Journal of Southern Agricultural Education Research, (2001). 51 (1) p. 173-188.  Bakers, M. & Rudd, R.

  27. Guilford's Structure of the Intellect. The Co-Creativity Institute. (2000) www, cocreativity, com.. Retrieved November 11, 2017.  Glenn Ellyn.

  28. Joy Paul Guilford: A Biographical Memoir.  National Academy of Science. Washington D.C. 1993. Comrey, A.L.

  29. Characteristics of Creativity Illinois State Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, Springfield. Gifted Children Section. 1973. p. 1-9. J.P. Guilford. 

  30. Teaching Biology Through Creative Writing: Integrating Abstract Biological Concepts into Narrative Context Makes Science Come Alive for Apprehensive Nonmajors. JCST. February 1997. p.277-279. Willis L. Kirkland

  31.  Assessing Creativity: The Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production (TCP-DP).  International Educational Journal. Vol 6 (2), 2005. p. 272-280.  Klaus K. Urban ISSNN 1443-1475. Recuperado el 15 de mardo del 2018.

  32. Structure and Freedom in Creativity: The Interplay Between Externally Imposed Structure and Personal Cognitive Style. Journal of Organizational Behavior August 2009.  DOI: 10.1002/job.664.  Lilach Sagiv, Sharon Arieli, Jacob Goldenberg, and Ayalla Goldschmidt.
  33. Improving Science Attitude and Creative Thinking through Science Education Project: A Design, Implementation and Assessment.  Journal of Education and Training Studies.  July 2015. Vol 3, No. 4: E-ISSN 2324-8068  Nilay Sener, Cumhur Türk, Erol Tas
  34. Creative and Critical Thinking in the Arts and Sciences: Some Examples of Congruence.  p. 1-9 Forum on Public Policy.  Scott L Karakas, 
  35. Creative Arts: An Essential Element in the Teacher´s Toolkit When Developing Critical Thinking in Children.  Australian Journal of Teacher Education.  July 2013.  Vol 38.  No. 7.  pp.1-17 Caroline Nilson, Catherine M. Fetherston, Anne Mc Murray, Tony Fetherson
  36. How does Creativity Complement Today's Currency of Innovation?  Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability 2012  Vol 7 (3).  pp. 9-15.  Tyler Lewis, Geoffrey A, Wright.
  37. What do we know about Creativity?  The Journal of Effective Teaching, Vol 7, No, 1, 2007, pp. 31-43.  José G. Gomez.
  38. Pensamiento lateral: Diez Técnicas para Encontrar Soluciones Creativas. Http://www.tomcomputers,com.ar-Tomcomputers.  Powered by Mambo Open Source,  Generated February 8, 2010.  12-42.
  39. ¨Creative Final Projects¨ in Mathematics and Science: An Educational Instrument for Maximizing Students´ Learning and Understanding.  JCST February 2000.  Vol XXIX # 4 p, 272-278.  Abour Cherif and Stefanos Gialamas.
  40. Techniques to enhance creative thinking. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, Vol 6 Iss 3/4 pp. 62-72.  Elspeth McFadzean.
  41. Creative and Critical Thinking in the Arts and Sciences: Some Examples of Congruence.  Forum Public Policy.  Scott L. Karakas.  General Education Program Director/Associate Professor of Art History, Florida Gulf Coast University.
  42. La Creativdidad en el Aula.  Boletín electrónico No. 7.  III Seminario de Educación Cristiana realizado en Guatemala el 2 de septiembre de 2006.  URL_07_BAS02.pdf.  p. 1-10.  Ing. Nidia Giorgis de Orozco.
  43. Educate for Creativity: New Educational Strategies.  Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 7th World Conference on Educational Science 5-7 February 2015, Novotel Athens Convention Center, Athens, Greece. Francesca Saliceti.
  44.  Introducing Creative in a Design Laboratory for A Freshman Level Electrical and Computer Engineering Course.  American Journal of Engineering Education. June 2014 Vol 5, No. 1.  Susan L. Burkett, Sushma Kotru, John C Lusth, Debra McCallum, Sarah Dunlap.

  45. Supporting Awareness in Creative Group Work by Exposing Design Rationale.  Human Technology. August 2011 Vol 7 (2), p. 123-141  ISSN 1795-6889  Umer Farooq y John M. Carroll

  46. The Value of Teaching Creativity in Adult Education.  International Journal of Higher Education. 2012.  Vol 1. No. 2  pp.84-91.  ISSN 1927-6052.  Kuan Chen Tsai.

  47. Inventing Creativity: An Exploration of the Pedagogy of Ingenuity in Science Classrooms.  School Science and Mathematics. Vol 113 (8) pp.400-409.  Allison       Antink Meyer and Norman G. Lederman.

  48. Creatividad y su culturación.  Jiannong Shie, Tangran Liu, Xiangy Qu.

  49. Developing critical and creative thinking: in science. Department for Education. Crown copyright 2008. The National Strategies Secondary. www.education.gov.uk

  50. A Three-Year Study of Continuity of Creative Growth under a Cognitive-Structured Approach to Educational Stimulation. Research and Development Center in Educational Stimulation. University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia. September, 1969.  E. Paul Torrance and Victor K. Phillips.

  51. Pensamiento Complejo y Educación.  Madrid: Ediciones de la Torre. 1991. p.86-91. M. Lipman

  52. Characteristcs of Creativity. Department for Exeptional Children Gifted Children Section, Springfield Illinois.  J. P. Guilford.


LEARNING AND TEACHING.


  1. Student´s participation in classroom: What motivates them to speak up? Procedia Social and Behavior Sciences. 2012 (51) p. 516-522 ISSN: 1877-0428  Mohd. Yusof Abdullah, Noor Rahmah Abu Bakar, Maizatul Haizan Mahbob.

  2. The Vee Heuristic for Understanding Knowledge and Knowledge Production. Cambridge University Press London Learning How to Learn  1985 Chapter 3 pp. 55-75 ISBAN 0 521 26507  by Joseph D. Novak and D. Bob Gowin

  3. Diagrama  V de Gowin Dosificado. Universidad Vasco de Quiroga. 19 de octubre de 2013.  Fernando Alejandre Ávalo.

  4. Impact of Gender, Ethnicity, YEar in School, Social Economic Status, and State Standardized Assessment Scores on Student Content Knowledge Achievement When Using Vee Maps as a Formative Assessment Tool. Journal of Agricultural Education 2011 Vol 52. No. 1 pp. 85-95  Doi: 10.5032/jae.2011.01085  Andrew C. Thoron and Brian E. Myers.

  5. The Use of Concept Mapping and Vee in Higher Education to Promote Critical Reflection and Meaningful Learning. Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers. 2012  Vol 4 (1)  ISNN 1989-9572  pp. 181-194 Jacqueline Vanhear

  6. La Uve Heurística de Gowin y el Mapa Conceptual como Estrategias que Favorece el Aprendizaeje Experimental.  Enseñanza de las Ciencias  2005 p.1-4.  Carmen Sansón Ortega, Rosa M González Muradas, Pilar Montagut Bosque, Francis Navarro Leon

  7. Secondary Pre-service Teachers´ Use of Vee Diagrams to Analyse Problems and Illustrate Multiple Solutions. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development 2008/2009, Vol10, pp. 15-29. Karoline Afamasaga.Fuata´i

  8. Commanding Strategies by Hispanic Students as They Think About Their Own Thinking Process. Annual Meeting of the National Association for Bilingual Education February, 2001  p. 2-11 Ana Gil-Garcia, Rosario Canalizales 

  9. Cognitive Science Concepts and Teaching Teacher Education. The Journal of Technology Studies.  p. 33-42. Dan Brown.

  10. Instructors Beliefs and Values about Learning Problem Solving. Procedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, Rochester NY, July 2001. Patricia Heller, Kenneth Heller, Charles Henderson, VInce H. Kuo, Edit Yerushami

  11. Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically: A Meta-Analysis.  Review of Educational Research June 2013 vol 85 No. 2 pp. 275-314. Philip C. Abrami, Robert M. Bernard, Eugene Borokhovski, David I. Waddington, C Anne Wade, and Tonje Person.

  12. Teaching Problem-Solving and Critical-Thinking Skills Online Using Problem-Based Learning.  Educational Technology January-February 2014 pp 20-25  Liz Romero. Agnes Orzechowski, Ola Rahatka

  13. La Ventaja de los Criterios, La Esencialidad del Jucio. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa 2008 vol 1 No. 3 ISSN 1989-0397 pp. 18-28.  Robert E. Stake

  14. Professional Task-Basesd Curriculum Development for Distance Education Practitioner at Master's Level: A Design/Based Research. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. April 2015 Vol 16 No. 2 pp. 288-310 Xiaoying Feng, Guangxin Lu, Zhihong Yao.

  15. Attitude, learning styles, and the workplace.  Journal of Vocational Education and Training. Dec 2006  pp. 281-292.  ISSN: 1363-6820  Fay Smith

  16. More like real life-motivational methods of teaching in upper secondary school. US-China Educational Review, ISSN 1548-6613 Nov 2009, Vol 6, No 11 pp. 46-56  Ewa Ivarsson.Jansson, Karen Cooper,Harriet Augusén, Marie Frykland.

  17. Performing Curriculum: Exploring the Role of Teachers and Teacher Educators. Part II Section D. Teaching Curriculum. The SAGE Handbook of Curriculum and Instruction. Edited by F.M Connelly and reviewed by Catherine Harris-Hart.

  18. Getting Students Talking: Supporting Classroom Discussion Practices in Inquiry-Based Science in Real-Time Teaching. The American Biology Teacher. October 2014. Vol 76 No. 8.  p, 501-505- Nonye Alozie, Claire Mitchell.

  19. The Ennis Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test. Midwest publication. 1985. pp. 1-14 ISBBN 0-89455-290-2 Recuperado el 27 de agosto de 2018Robert H. Ennis and Eric Weir

  20. Systematic design of a learning environment for domain-specific and domain-general critical thinking skills. Education Tech Research Dev (2016) 64: 481-505. DOI 10.1007/s11423-015-9417-2. Dawit Tibebu Tiruneh, Ataklti G. Weldeslassie, Abrham Kassa, Zinaye Tefera, Micke De Cock, Jan Elen.

  21. Active learning education in the Museum. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) March 2020. Vol 9 No. 1 pp. 120-128. ISSN: 2252-8822. Irem Namli Altintas, Cigdem Kozaner Yenigüi

  22. Using Formative Assessments to Individualize Instruction and Promote Learning. Middle School Journal. March 2006 p. 44-49.  Juliann M. Kattan, Goyle A. Buck, Alysa Haack. 

  23. Place and Pedagogy.  The NAMTA Journal.  Winter 2013.  Vol 38 No, 1 pp. 183-188.  David Orr.

  24. Social & Cooperative: Learning in the Solving of Case Histories.  The American Biology Teacher.  February 2007.  Vol 69.  No. 2 pp. 80-84.  Deena Goran, Stan Braude.

  25. Designing and Implementing Group Contingencies in the Classroom: A Teacher´s Guide.  Teaching Exceptional Children, January/February 2016  pp. 132-143.  Jason C. Chow and Allison F. Gilmour.

  26. Sanz de Acedo Lizárraga, M. L (2001). La argumentación: Una forma de razonamiento informal.  Psicología General y Aplicada, 54 (3), 355-370.
  27. Interdisciplinary Curriculum and Instruction: Teaming To Improve Learning and Motivation.  Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (San Francisco, CA, April 18-22, 1995). Hange Jane; Rolfe Helen
  28. Trif, Letitia. & Popescu, Teodora. (2013).  The reflective diary, an effective professional training instrument for future teachers.  3rd World Conference on Learning and Educational Leadership-WCLTA 2012. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93 p. 1070-1074
  29. Jalilifar, A., Khazaie,S., & Ahmadpour, K. (2014). Critical Discourse Analysis of Teachers’ Written Diaries Genre: The Critical Thinking Impact on Cognition.  Focus 95, 735-741
  30. Colley, B.M., Billics, A.R., & Lerch, C.M. (2012).  Reflection: A Key Component to Thinking Critically. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 3 (1) 9-25.
  31. Van Kooten, C (2016, Spring).  Identifying Components of Meta-Awareness about Composition: Toward a Theory and Methodology for Writing Studies.  Composition Forum, 33. Retrieved July 4, 2018.
  32. Stencel, J. E (1998, March/April).  An Interactive Lecture Notebook-Twelve Ways to Improve Students' Grades. JCST, 343-345.

  33. Colley, B.M., Billics, A.R., & Lerch, C.M. (2012).  Reflection: A Key Component to Thinking Critically. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 3 (1) 9-25.

  34. Van Kooten, C (2016, Spring).  Identifying Components of Meta-Awareness about Composition: Toward a Theory and Methodology for Writing Studies.  Composition Forum, 33. Retrieved July 4, 2018.

  35. Towndrow, P., Ali Kink, T., & Venthan, A. (2008). Promoting Inquiry Through Science Reflective Journal Writing.  Eurasian Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education, 4(3), 279-283.

  36. Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically: A Meta-Analysis. June 2015   Vol 83  No. 2 pp. 275-314.  Philip C. Abrami, Robert M. Bernard, Eugene Borokhovski, David I. Waddington, C. Anne Wade, and Tonje Persso

  37. Self-Actualization.  The Cursini Encyclopedia of Psychology and Behavioral Science.  Third Edition vol 4. p. 1467-1468.  ISSN: 0-471-23949-6  W. Edward Graighead y Charles B. Nemeoff.  

  38. Critical Discourse Analysis of Teachers' Written Diaries Genre: The Critical Thinking Impact on Cognition in Focus.  Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014.  Vol 98.  pp. 735-741.  Alireza Jalilifar, Saeed Khazaie, Zahra Ahmapour Kasgari

  39. The Cornell Conditional Reasoning Test Form X,  1964.  Robert H. Ennis, William L. Gardiner, John Guzzetta, Richard Morrow, Dieter Paulus, Lucille Ringel.

  40. Teoría y Pedagogía del Pensamiento Sistemático y Crítico. Universidad de Puerto Rico Organización para el Fomento del Desarrollo del Pensamiento. p. 1-11.  Ángel R. Villarini Jusino.

  41. Does College Teach Critical Thinking?  A Meta-Analysis.  Review of Educational Research.  June 2016  Vol 86  No. 2  pp. 431-468.  DOI 10.3102/0034654315605917  Christopher R. Huber, Nathan R. Kuncel.

  42. Teach Critical Thinking to Teach Writing.  Educational Leadership  April 2014. Vol 71.  No. 7.  pp. 78-80.  Bryan Goodwin.

  43. Applied Inquiry-Based and Cooperative Group Learning Strategies to Promote Critical Thinking: Training Students' Minds and Improving Their Intellect to Become Informed Members of Society.  JCST December 1998-  January 1999. pp. 203-207.  Amelia J, Ahern-Rindell 

  44. Teacher Perceptions of Critical Thinking Among Students and its Influence on Higher Education.  International Journal of Teaching and Learning on Higher Education.  2009  vol. 20 No. 2  pp. 198-206.  ISSN 1812-9129.  S Chee Choy, Phaik Kin Cheah.

  45. Students´ Conceptual Understanding and Critical Thinking: A case for concept maps and vee diagrams in mathematics problem-solving.  Making Mathematics Vital 2004.  Karoline Afamasaga-Fuata´i.

  46. Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment Predicts Real World Outcomes of Critical Thinking.  Applies Cognitive Psychology.  2012  Vol. 26.  pp. 721.-729.  Heather Butler.

  47. Analysis Problems-A Means to Develop Students´Critical-Thinking Skills.  JCST.  March/April  2000  pp. 348-352.  Joyce R. Kronberg and Marshall S. Griffin.

  48. A Baseline Study of Strategies to Promote Critical Thinking in the Preschool Classroom.  Gist Education and Learning Research Journal.  2015.  January-June No. 10. pp. 113-127.  Jenny Melo León..

  49. From Passive Learners to Critical Thinkers: Preparing EFL Students for University Success.  English Teaching Forum. 2010  No, 3  pp. 2-9.  Nahmuda Shaila y Beth Trudell.  

  50. Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview Barry J. Zimmerman.  Educational Psychologist Vol 25. No. 1. pp 3-17. Barry J. Zimmerman.

  51. A Course-Based Model to Promote Successful Transition to College for Students with Learning Disorders.  Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability 2007; vol 20, No, 1 pp. 40-53.  Constance Chiba, Richard Low.

  52. Information, U. G. (2021, October 13). Consider the Teacher Act of 2021. Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ49/PLAW-117publ49.pdf

  53. The effect of school culture and climate on student achievement.  International Journal of Leadership in Education. 2009. ISSN Online: 1464-5092.  Angus J. MacNeil, Doris L. Prater y Steve Busch.

  54. Reading Specialist.  Reading Strategies in Action. 10/4/2008. p. 1-7.  http://www.mario.k12.ky.us/Strategies/Reading/readingspecialist/glossary.htm

  55. Student response to criteria-reference self-assessment.  Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Routledge. Vol 32 No. 2. April 2007, pp. 159-181.  Heide Andrade and Ying Du.

  56. How to Transform Teaching with Tablets.  Educational Leadership May 2015. Vol. 72 No. 8 p.18-23.  Tom Daccord and Justin Reich.  ASCD.org.
  57. La lectura es primero: Como ayudar a su hijo aprender a leer (Una guía para padres de familia: Del preescolar al tercer grado).  The Partnership for Reading, National Institute for Literacy, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.  U.S. Department of Education.  U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
  58. Is a question a question? Passage Understanding by Preadolescents with Learning Disabilities.  Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools.  October 1994 Vol 25, pp. 241-250.  Elizabeth H. Wig. and Carolyn C. Wilson.
  59. Método de Aprendizaje Cooperativo Informal.  Estructuras de Aprendizaje Cooperativo. Laboratorio de Inovación Edicativa. p.43-49.  Spencer Kagan.
  60. Heurística de Gowin (1999).  Diccionario de Pedagogía (2nd. ed. p. 305).  Buenos Aires, Argentian: Magisterio del  Rio de la Plata.  E. Ander Egg
  61. Analogía como Instrumentos de Investigación.  Dialogos Julio 2012.  Vol 44 No. 93. pp. 53-68.  ISBN 0012-2122.  http:// humanidades.uprrp.edu/  Carla Cordua.
  62. Designing Instruction That Supports Cognitive Learning Processes. Journal of Athletic Training 2002 vol 34  No. 4.  Ruth Clark, Gary L. Harrelson.. 
  63. Classroom layout-what does the research say?  Teacher Magazine. March 16, 2017.  p.1-5  Jo Earp  https://www/teacheramagazine.com,au
  64. Structures for Facilitating Student Reflection.  College Teaching Winter 2009 Vol 57 No. 1  pp. 15-22. Robert Groosman.
  65. An Integrated Inquiry Activity in an Elementary Teaching Methods Classroom. Science Activities, 2010. 47:  29-34  ISSN: 0036-8121.  Tahsin Khalid.
  66. Enseñar a pensar desde la fenomenología.  Philosophy and Children. UNED (Madrid, España) Carmen López Sáenz. Retrieved on 02/09/2007 http://www.bu.edu/wep/Papers/Chil/ChilSaen.htm
  67. Why do good ideas block better ones? Research and Science. May 2014. #452 Spanish Edition of Scientific American. p. 79-83. Merim Bilalié and Peter McLeod.
  68. Examining of Model Eliciting Activities Developed By Mathematics Student Teachers.  Journal on Mathematics Education.  Vol 8. No, 2 July 2017 pp. 223-242 ISSN 2087-8885.  Ayse Tekin Dede, Caglar Naci Hidiroglu, Esra Bukova Güzel
  69. Analyzing the Statistical Reasoning Levels of Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers in the Context of a Model Eliciting Activity.  International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES) 2017 vol 3 No, 1 p. 20-30.  Alkas Ulosoy, C & Kayhan Altay, M. ISSN: 2148-9955
  70. Statistical Analysis of Cooperative Strategy Compared with Individualistic Strategy: An Application Study.  The Journal of Effective Teaching, Vol 11, No. 1, 2011, p.19-27.  Tawfik A. Saleh
  71. Examining Student Thinking Through Video Analysis. Educational Technology.  January-February 2010. p.23-27.  Michael D. Preston.
  72. Problem-based learning as a pedagogical approach in health education. Colombia Medica. 2001. Vol 32 No. 4, p.189-196. Victor Hugo Dueñas.
  73. Jonassen, D.H. (September-October, 2007) A Taxonomy of Meaningful Learning.  Educational Technology, 47 (5), p. 30-35.
  74. The Effects of Informational Complexity and Working Memory on Problem-Solving Efficiency.  Asian Pacific Education Review.  2008.  Vol 9. No. 4, p. 464-474.  Bobby Hoffman, Matthew T. McCrudden, Gregory Schraw, Kendall Hartley.
  75. Reflective Assessment in Knowledge Building by Students with Low Academic Achievement.  Intern. J. Comput Support Collab Learn 2016 11: 281-311  DOI 10.1007/s11413-016-9239-1  Yuqin Yang, Jan Van Aalst, Carol K.K. Chan, Wen Tian.
  76. Identifying Components of Meta-Awareness about Composition: Toward a Theory and Methodology for Writing Studies. Composition Forum 33, Spring 2016.  Crystal Vankooten
  77. Teacher Perceptions on What a Functional Curriculum Should be for Children with Special Needs.  International Journal of Special Education,  2005.  Vol 20. No. 2. p 6-18.  Jessie Ee and Kay Chaen Soh
  78. Improving Science Pedagogic Quality in Elementary School Using Process Skill Approach Can Motivate Students to be Active in Learning.  Journal of Education and Practice. 2016. ISSN 2222-288X Vol 7 No. 5   Sukiniarti.
  79. Los museos: un instrumento para el Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas (ABP).  Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 2011 vol 8 (3), p. 312-322.  Yosajandi Pérez Campillo, José Antonio Chamizo Guerrero.
  80. Educar en valores a través de un club de lectura escolar: un estudio de caso. Revista Complutense de Educación, 2013 Vol 21 Núm 2. p, 303-319.  ISNN 1130-2496.  Carmen Álvarez Álvarez y Raquel Gutierrez Sebastián.
  81. A Study on the Link between Moral Judgment Competences and Critical Thinking Skills.  International Journal of Environment & Science Education, 2015, 10 (2), p. 135-143.  ISNN: 1306-3065.  Nilay Keskin Samanci.
  82. Skills development, habit of mind, and the spiral curriculum: A dialectic approach to undergraduate general education curriculum mapping.  Cogent Education. 2016 Vol 3 No, 1  ISNN 2331-186X  Jeffrey W. Murray
  83.  The Discussion Teaching Method: An Interactive Strategy in Tertiary Learning.  The Journal of Computer in Mathematics and Science Teaching. Fall 2007. Vol 128  No. 1 pp. 87-94.  ISSN0731-9258. Bridget OJ. Omatseye.
  84. About the reflective thought also known as the critical thinking.  Propósitos y Representaciones. 2014 vol 2 No. 1 pp. 190-214. eISSN: 2310-4614 Federico R. León. 
  85. What is Design Thinking and Why is It Important? Review of Educational Research.  September 2012, Vol 82 No. 3, pp. 330-348. DOI 10.3102/003465432457429.  Rim Razzouk y Valerie Shute.
  86. Judgment of learning and improvement.  Mem Cogn (2011) Vol 24 pp. 204-216. DOI 10.3758/s13421.010-0019-2 Corinne L. Townsend and Evan Heit.
  87. An exploratory study of the achievement of twenty-first-century skills in higher education.  Education Training Vol 52 issue 6/7 pp. 489/498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00400911011068441   Ghazi Ghaith
  88. El desarrollo del pensamiento de los estudiantes a través de la enseñanza.  Revista Iberoamericana de Educación. (ISSN 1681-5653).  Miguel E. Zaldivar Carrillo y Yamilka Sosa Oliva.
  89. On the Relation of Reasoning and Rationality. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Jean Piaget Society (17th, Philadelphia, PA. May 28-30. 1987). Moshman, Da

  90. ¨Changing the Way I Teach¨: Building Teacher Knowledge, Confidence and Autonomy. Journal of Teacher Education. 64 (2). 2012. Rebecca C. Dierking and Roy F. Foz.  DOI: 10..1177/0022487112462893

  91. 8. The Role of Self Regulated Learning in Contextual Teaching: Principles and Practices For Teacher Preparation.  CIERA Archive Vol 1 No. 3.  p. 1-23. Recuperado 2018.  Scott G. Paris and Peter Winograd. 

  92. Stake´s Countenance Model: Evaluating an Environmental Education Professional Development Course. The Journal of Environmental Education.  Vol 32 (2). 2001 p. 18-27. Barbara Bonsall Wood.

  93. An Interactive Lecture Notebook Twelve Ways to Improve Students´Grades: Drawing Students´Attention to What They Need to Know in Lecture.  JCST. March/April 1998. p. 343-345.  John E. Stencel.

  94. The curriculum: Patchwork or Crazy Quilt? Educational Leadership. November 1978. p. 114-116.  Gail McCutcheon.

  95. Quality in initial teacher education Quality Assurance in Education Vol 8 (2) 2000 p. 53-69. David Blake & Jenny Lansdell  ISSN 0968-4833

  96. The Structure of Knowledge and the Structure of the Curriculum.  Assessment of the Curriculum (1964). p. 25-40.  New York, USA: Bureau of Publications. Bellack, A. A

  97. Teacher perceptions of Critical Thinking Among Students and its Influence on Higher Education.  International Journal of Teaching and Learning Higher Education. (2009). p. 198-206.  Chee Choy, S y Kin Cheah, P.

  98. The Zone of Proximal Development in Vygotsky´s  Analysis of Learning and Instruction. (2003). In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev y S. Miller, Vygotsky Educational Theory and Practice in Cultural Context p.1-20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Chaiklin, S

  99. La Complejidad de los Objetivos Educativos. J. S Brunner: La Educación Puerto de la Cultura (1997),  Madrid: Visor.  Brunner, J.S.

  100. Needed: A Theory of Instruction.  Educational Leadership, (May 1963) p. 523-532. Brunner, Jerome S.  Recuperado el 24 de noviembre de 2017.  

  101. Think Critical Thinking and Logic Skills for Everyday Life (2012) 2nd Ed. NY, USA: McGraw Hill.  Boss, J.A 

  102.  On the Cultivation of Students´ Interest in Biology Teaching. International Education Studies. May 2011.  Vol 4(2). p.141-143. Yan Li.  www.cesenet. org/ies. doi: 10.5539/ies.v4n2p141.

  103. Dynamic Testing of Gifted and Average-Ability Children´s Analogy Problem Solving: Does Executive Functioning Play a Role?  Psychol Schs. 2017: 54: 837-851. Wiley.  Bart Vogelaar, Merel Bakker, Lianne Hoogeveen, Wilma C.M. Resing.  Doi: 10. 1002/pits.22032

  104. An Example of the Use of Personal Analogy in Teaching Geography: If I Were a Mineral.  Academic Journals 2016 Vol 11 (8) pp. 721-731  Article number: C643440581.35. ISSN: 1990-3839.  Nese Duman.

  105. Statistics and Hypothesis Testing in Biology: Teaching Students the Relationship Between Statistical Test and Scientific Hypothesis.  JCST February 1991. p. 283-285.  Timothy J. Maret and Robert E. Ziemba.

  106. Analogy, Higher Order Thinking, and Education. Wire Cognitive Science. March /April 2015 vol 6 p. 177-192.  Lindsey Engle Richard and Nina Simms.

  107. Educación básada en el cerebro.  Med UNAB. (Abril-Julio 2013) Vol 16 (1) p. 34-48.  Silvia Juliana Franco Corso, MD.

  108. The Role of Assessment in Building a Student-Centered Curriculum.  Quality in the Classroom Sept 1998 Vol 3 (3) p. 4-5.   Lynne M. Whoehrle.

  109. Alverno Provides Hands-On Approach to Learning. Quality in the Classroom Sept 1998 Vol 3 (3) p. 2-3.  Rebecca Stapay.

  110.  What was Your Best Learning Experience?  Our Story About Using Stories to Solve Instructional Problems.  International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.  2013. Vol 25(2), p. 269-274  ISSN: 1812-0129.  Joanna C. Dunlap, Patrick R. Lowenthal.

  111. Administración por objetivos.  Capítulo 9: Maggie Crespo Ocasio.

  112. Critical Thinking and the Use of Nontraditional Instructional Methodologies.  Journal of Nursing Education.  2015  Vol 54.  No. 1.  pp. 455-459.  Sabrina B. Orinque and Mary Ann McCarthy.

  113. Undergraduates as Science Museum Docents: Teaching Students to Be the Teachers Using Peer-Led Team Learning.  The American Biology Teacher.  January 2009. Vol 71, No. 1.  Robert E. Pyatt, Tracie Rosser, Kelly Powell. 

  114. Student conceptions of peer-assisted learning.  Journal of Further and Higher Education, Routledge. 2015.  Vol 39, No. 4, pp. 579-597.  Doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2014.938262.  Yvonne Hodgson, Robyn Benson, and Charlotte Brack.

  115. Vocabulary Instruction: A Critical Analysis of Theories, Research, and Practice.  Education Science. 2018, Vol 8  No. 180. Doi: 10: 3390/educsci 8040180.  pp. 1-22.  Stephanie Moody, Xuenyan Hu, Li-Jen Kuo, Mohammed Jouhar, Zhihong Xu, and Sungyoon Lee.  

  116. The Importance of Learning to Make Assumptions.  Science Education 2008.  DOI 10.1002/sec. 20295.  David Fortus. 

  117. Communities of Thinking.  Educational Leadership.  November 2000. pp. 54-58.  Yoram Harpaz and Adam Lefstein.

  118. Student conceptions of peer-assisted learning.  Journal of Further and Higher Education, Routledge. 2015.  Vol 39, No. 4, pp. 579-597.  Doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2014.938262.  Yvonne Hodgson, Robyn Benson, and Charlotte Brack

  119. Vocabulary Instruction: A Critical Analysis of Theories, Research, and Practice.  Education Science. 2018, Vol 8  No. 180. Doi: 10: 3390/educsci 8040180.  pp. 1-22.  Stephanie Moody, Xuenyan Hu, Li-Jen Kuo, Mohammed Jouhar, Zhihong Xu, and Sungyoon Lee.  

  120. The Importance of Learning to Make Assumptions.  Science Education 2008.  DOI 10.1002/sec. 20295.  David Fortus. 

  121.  Critical Thinking and the Use of Nontraditional Instructional Methodologies.  Journal of Nursing Education.  2015  Vol 54.  No. 1.  pp. 455-459.  Sabrina B. Orinque and Mary Ann McCarthy.

  122. From Teaching to Know to Learning to Think for Sustainability: What Should it Take?  And How to Do it? Journal of Modern Education Review.  October 2011, Vol 1 No, 1 pp. 34-40.  ISSN: 2155-7993.  Uri Zoller.

  123. Commentary: Measuring Divergent Thinking: Is There Really One Solution to the Problem? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and The Arts.  2008 Vol 2. No. 2 pp.86-88. pp.86-88.  Michael D. Mumford, William B. Vessey, and Jamie D. Barret.

  124. How much vocabulary is needed for comprehension of research publications in education?  Concordia University, Montreal Canada.  pp.94-99.  Clinton Hendry and Emily Sheepy. 

  125. The Vocabulary-Comprehension Relationship across the Disciplines: Implications for Instruction.  Educations Sciences.  2018.  Vol 8  no. 101  pp.1-9 DOI: 10.3390/educsci8030101   Janis Harmon and Karen Wood.

  126. Teachers as Learners: The Impact of Teachers´ Morphological Awareness on Vocabulary Instruction.  Education Science.  2018  Vol 8 No. 161. pp.1-9.   DOI: 10.3390/educsci8040161.  Joanna Newton.

  127. Comparative Study of the Links between the Secondary and Post Secondary Education Systems in Six Nations.  Asian Social Protection in Comparative Perspective Conference, Singapore, 7-9 January 2009.  pp. 1-39.  Christoph Metzger, Rebecca Maynard, Sumonta Promboon, Tsukasa Daizen, Kin Yuen Ip, So.-Young Park, Julie Vultaggio.

  128. Punto de vista encontrados ¿Revolucionará el IPAD la educación? EDUKATE. (2013)  Will the IPAD Revolutionize Education?¨Learning and Leading with Technology (May, 2011). Eric A. Walters & Michael Baum.

  129. 1mplementation of Pair Work and Group Work for Creation of Interaction Opportunities for Learners in Large Classes: The Viability of the Two Strategies.  Journal of Education and Practice. ISSN 2222-1735.  Vol 6 No. 10. 2015. pp.171-180 Ruth O. Otienoh.

  130. . Learning How to Learn: A Model for Teaching Students Learning Strategies.  Bioscience May 2009 Vol 35 (1) pp. 35-42.  Shawn E. Nordell

  131. Student Experience of Group Work and Group Assessment in Higher Education.  Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism.  ISSN 1531-3239 (online)  Sep (2008). pp.17-39.  Recuperado May 15, 2018.  Ahmed Hassanien.

  132. Effectiveness of Working Individually Versus Cooperative Groups: A Classroom-Based Research Project.  University of Pennsylvania. Master in Science Education Program. April 7, 2007. Elisha Roy Bryson.

  133. Theories in Development Oral Communication for Specific Learner Group.  University Mataram Nahdlatul Wathan University. 26 de febrero de 2016. By Marham Jupri Hadi.

  134. Peer tutoring: old method, new developments/Tutoría entre iguales: método antiguo, nuevos avances. Infancia y Aprendizaje. 24 de febrero de 2015. ISSN 0210-3702.  Keith Topping.

  135. Critical Practical Analogy: A Research Tool for Reflecting and Making. Journalist of Research Practice. Vol 7, Issue 1, Article P2, 2011. ISBN 1712-851X, Dino Alfier

  136. Social Cognitive Model of College Satisfaction: A Test of Measurement and Path Model. College Student Journal Dec 2012. Vol 46 No. 4 ISSN: 0146-3934 Ronald C. Feldt

  137. Think Bubbles and Socrates: Teaching Critical Thinking to Millennials in Public Relations Classes. Universal Journal of Educational Research (2015) 3(7); 435-441. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2015.030702.  Rebecca J. Tallent, Justin J. Barnes.

  138. Control de la acción y disposición a la esperanza: un estudio de incidencia en la autorregulación del aprendizaje. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology. Jan 1, 2010. ISSN: 1699-5880. Georgia Papantoniou, Despina Moraitou, Effie Katsadima, Magda Dinou.

  139. A taxonomy of Meaningful Learning. Educational Technology September-October 2007.  pp. 30-35.  David H. Jonassen.

  140. From Teaching-to-Know-to-Learning-to-Think for Sustainability: What should it take? And How to Do it?  Journal of Modern Education Review. October 2011, Vol 1 No. 1 pp. 34-40. p. 34-40. ISSN 2155-7993.  Uri Zoller.

  141. Learning and competencies for the 21st century.  Prospects (2014) 44: 483-486. DOI 10.1007/s11125-014-0933-y  P.T.M. Marope.

  142. Great Expectations: Creative Achievements of the Sociometric Stars in a 30-year study. JSGE (The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education. Fall 2004.Vol XVI. No 1  p. 5-13  El Paul Torrance.

  143. Evaluating the Curriculum Improvement Plan. Chapter 13. pp. 183-195.

  144. From Teaching.to.know-to-Learning-to-Think for Sustainability: What Should it Take? And How to Do it?  Journal of Modern Education Review, ISSN 2155-7993, USA.  October 2011, Vol 1 No. 1 pp, 34-40. Uri Zoller

  145. Reflection: A Key Component to Thinking Learning. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 2012 vol 3 Issue 1 pp. 1-20. Binta M. Colley. Andrea R. Bilics. Carol M. Lerch

  146. Teacher Perceptions of Critical Thinking Among Students and its Influence on Higher Education. International Journal of the Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 2009 Vol 20 No. 2 pp. 198-206. ISSN 1812-9129  S. Chee Choy and Phaik  Kin Cheah

EDUCATION IN SCIENCE


  1. Teaching Critical & Analytical Thinking in High School Biology? The American Biology Teacher, March 2012 Vol 74  No. 3 p, 178-181  ISSN 0002-7685  Gaby McDonald
  2. Habits of Mind: Integrating the Social and Personal Characteristics of Doing Science Into the Science Classroom. School Science and Mathematics March 1999 vol 99 No. 3. pp. 141-147  Mark J. Volkmann and David C. Eichinger
  3. Assessing Investigative Skill Development in Inquiry-Based and Traditional College Science Laboratory Courses. School Science and Mathematics October 2004 Vol 104 (6) pp. 248-257. Jerry P. Suits
  4. Making ¨Making Critical: How Sustainability is Consituted in Fab Lab Ideology.  The Design Journal. 2017 vol 20 No. 3, p. 375-394  ISNN: 1460-6925.  Cindy Kohtala.
  5. Construcción de un marco teórico/conceptual para abordar el trabajo de laboratorio usando el diagram V: un studio de caso de la UPEL/IPC Revista de Investigación Mayo-Agosto 2011 Vol 35 No. 73 pp. 241-266  Julia Flores, María Concesa Caballero, Marco Antonio Moreira
  6. The Effect of Vee Maps and Laboratory Reports on High-and Low-Order Content-Knowledge Achievement in Agriscience Education. Journal of Agricultural Education 2013 Vol 54 No. 3 pp 198-208 DOI: 10.5032/jae.2013.03198  Andrew C. Thoron and Eric D. Rubenstein 
  7. A Proposal for the Use of Heuristic Techniques and Concept Maps in ICP-IPN. Concept Mapping Connecting Educators Proce of the third Int. Conference on Concept Mapping Tallinn, Estonia & Helsinki, Finland 2008 Beatriz Dolores Guardian Soto, IPN, Mexico, Ferm[in González Garcia, UPNAM, SPAIN, Abel Camacho Galván, UNAM, Mexico.
  8. Evaluación de Aprendizaje que promuevan las CPC II.  Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile 8 de octubre 2007 Equipo Fonecyt
  9. Propuesta de una herramienta didáctica basada en la V de Gowin para la resolución de problemas de física. Revista Braseilera de Ensino de Física. 2013 Vol 35 No, 2 J. Gil, F. Solano, L.M. Tobajam P. Monfort
  10. Use of Vee Maps in a College Science Laboratory.  Paper Presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Meeting.  71st San Diego California, April 19-22, 1998.  Stacy Lebowitz. 
  11. Student labs on a university campus as a type of out-of-school learning environment: Assessing the potential to promote students´ interest in science.  International Journal of Environmental & Science Education.  Vol 6, No. 4, October 2011, p.371-392.  ISSN 1306-3065.  Ingrid Glowinski, Horst Baryhuber.
  12. Investigating the Effect of Argument-Driven Inquiry in Laboratory Instruction. Education Science Theory & Practice. (February 2015) Issue 15  No 1 p, 267-283. ISSN 2148-7561 Tubar Demircioglu, Sedat Ucar.
  13. Planning Instruction to Meet the Intent of the Next Generation Science Standards.  Journal of Science Teacher Education (2014) 25: p.157-175. Joseph Krajcik, Susan Condere, Chanyah Dahsah, Rence Bayer, Kongju Mun.
  14. Innovation Labs; A Professional Approach to Honors.  Rob Bormans, President of Rotterdam University of Applied Science (Netherlands)
  15. Design Critical Thinking Skills Through the Use of Guided Laboratory Activities.  The Science Education Review, 2003, 2 (2). Patrick Croner.
  16. Use root cause analysis teaching strategy to train primary pre-service science teachers.  US-China Education Review.  Dec, 2008. Vol 5 No. 12. ISSN 1548-6613.  LU Chow-chin,TSAI Chun-wei,  HONG Jon-chao.
  17. Como promover el exito delas niñas y las Minorías en las ciencias y en las Matemáticas.  Para Padres/ sobre Padres. NY, 1996.  Recuperado el 20 de enero de 2014. by Wendy Schwartz.  Translated by Michelle Montas.
  18. An Integrating Inquiry Activity in an Elementary Teaching Methods Classroom.  Science Education. 2010. Vol 47 p. 29-34. ISSN 0036-8121. p. 29-34.  Tahsin Khalid.
  19. Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses.  Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (2009) vol. 4 pp. 259-287.  DOI 10.1007/s11412-009-9069-5 Jan Van Aalst
  20. Towndrow, P., Ali Kink, T., & Venthan, A. (2008). Promoting Inquiry Through Science Reflective Journal Writing.  Eurasian Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education, 4(3), 279-283.
  21. Stencel, J. E (1998, March/April).  An Interactive Lecture Notebook-Twelve Ways to Improve Students' Grades. JCST, 343-345.
  22. Effect of Peers Assessment and Short Report in Year III Laboratory Course.  International Education Studies. May 13, 2013 Vol 6 No. 6  E-ISSN 1913-9039.  pp. 23-27.  Norliza Abd Rahman and Noorhisham Tan Kofli

  23. Rice, R. E. (1998, February).  ‘Scientific Writing’ A Course to Improve the Writing of Science Students. JCST. 267-271.

  24. Mayne, L.ynne (2012).  Reflective Writing as a Tool for Assessing Teamwork in Bioscience.  Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 40 (4), p. 234-240.

  25. Mair, Caroline, (2010).  Using Technology for Enhancing Reflective Writing, Metacognition and Learning. Journal of Further and Higher Education May 2012 Vol 36 No. 2 p. 147-167.

  26. Karaca, M. Oner Armagan, F., & Bektas, O. (2016).  The Use of the Reflective Diaries in Science Lessons from the Perspective of Eight Grades Students.  International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11, 53-74. Retrieved November 18, 2016.

  27. Individual and Group Antecedents of Job Satisfaction: A One Lab Multilevel Study.  Anales de Psicología Mayo 2016.  Vol 32 No. 2 p. 565-570  Doi: 10.6018/analesps 32.2.216801  Isabel M. Martínez y Eva Cifre.

  28. Statistical Analysis of Cooperative Strategy Compared with Individualistic Strategy: An Application Study.  The Journal of Effective Teaching, 2011. Vol 11. No. 1, pp. 19-27.  Tawfik A. Saleh.

  29. Preservice Elementary Teachers´ Images of Investors.  May 6, 2006.  Audrey C. Rule, Erica Lyn Bisbo, and Valerie Walloven.

  30. Contemporary Team Testing To Support Individual Learning: Can Teamwork Motivate Learning?  Contemporary Issues In Education Research- December 2010  Vol. 3 No. 12.  pp 7-16.  Leigh Stelzer, Joan Coll-Reilly.

  31.  Enseñar y Aprender Biología y Geología A Través de la Tutoría Entre Iguales.  Enseñanza de las Ciencias: Revista de Investigación y Experiencias Didácticas.  2013 Vol. 31 (3) pp. 189-206.  ISSN: 2174-6486.  Ode Moliner García, Lidón Moliner Miraver, Auxiliadora Sales Ciges.

  32. Girls in School/Women in Science: A Synopsis. Annual Women's Studies Conference (8th, Greely, CO, January 1984). Indiana: Purdue University.  Recuperado el 1 de marzo de 2016. Jane Butler Kahle.

  33. Spatial Ability Mediates the Gender Difference in Middle School Students' Science Performance.  Child Development, July/August 2014.  Volume 85, No. 4. pp. 1419-1432.  Collen M. Ganley, Marina Vasilyeva and Alana Dulane

  34. Gender Difference in Achievement and Attitude of Public Secondary School Students towards Science.  Journal of Education and Practice. 2015. ISNN 2222. 288X (online) Vol 6 No. 2.  pp. 87-92.  Oluwatelure, Temitayo, Abayoni

  35.  Análisis de los materiales instruccionales de ciencias naturales: sus implicaciones en los cursos nacionales de actualización.  Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa.  Marzo 2004  Vol 9.  No. 20  pp 199-228.  Fernando Flores, Alejandra García, Clara Alvarado, María del Carmen Sánchez Mora, Plinio Sosa, Bárbara Reachy.

  36.  Using Models to Support Argumentation in the Science Classroom.  The American Biology Teacher. September 2016 Vol 78. No 7. Ying-Chin Chen, Mathew J. Benus, Morgan B. Yarker.

  37. A Cooperative Learning Approach to Teaching Introductory Biology: Experimenting with an Innovative Teaching Style at the University of California, Davis.  JCST March/April 1998.  Daniel J. Klionsky.

  38. Investigation of primary students' motivation levels towards science learning.  Science Education International.  Vol 22. No 3. September 2011, p. 218-232.  Betül Sevinc, Haluk Özmen, Nevzat Yigit.

  39. Girls in School/Women in Science: A Synopsis. Annual Women's Studies Conference (8th, Greely, CO, January 1984). Indiana: Purdue University.  Recuperado el 1 de marzo de 2016. Jane Butler Kahle

  40. Towndrow, P., Ali Kink, T., & Venthan, A. (2008). Promoting Inquiry Through Science Reflective Journal Writing.  Eurasian Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education, 4(3), 279-283.

  41. Análisis de los materiales instruccionales de ciencias naturales: sus implicaciones en los cursos nacionales de actualización.  Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa.  Marzo 2004  Vol 9.  No. 20  pp 199-228.  Fernando Flores, Alejandra García, Clara Alvarado, María del Carmen Sánchez Mora, Plinio Sosa, Bárbara Reachy.

  42. Undergraduates as Science Museum Docents: Teaching Students to Be the Teachers Using Peer-Led Team Learning The American Biology Teacher.  January 2009. Vol 71, No. 1.  Robert E. Pyatt, Tracie Rosser, Kelly Powell.

  43. Investigation of primary students' motivation levels towards science learning.  Science Education International.  Vol 22. No 3. September 2011, p. 218-232.  Betül Sevinc, Haluk Özmen, Nevzat Yigit.

  44. Physics and Everyday Life-New Modules to Motivate Students.  US-China Education Review A. ISSN 2161-623X.  February 2013, Vol 3, No. 2, pp. 114-118.  Renata Holubova.

  45. Assessment of Project-Based Learning in a Mechatronics Context.  Journal of Technology Education.  Spring 2005.  Vol 16.  No. 2.  pp. 7-24.  Yaron Doppelt.

  46.  Análisis de los materiales instruccionales de ciencias naturales: sus implicaciones en los cursos nacionales de actualización.  Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa.  Marzo 2004  Vol 9.  No. 20  pp 199-228.  Fernando Flores, Alejandra García, Clara Alvarado, María del Carmen Sánchez Mora, Plinio Sosa, Bárbara Reachy

  47. What´s Important in Selecting a Biology Textbook?  The Amercian Biology Teacher, October 2013, Vol 75, No. 8, pp. 526-531.  William H. Leonard y John E. Penick.

  48. Ediger, M (1998). Writing and the Pupil in the Science Curriculum. pp. 1-18.

  49. Frederick, L, R, & Schaw Jr., E.L. (1998).  Examining the Effect of Science Manipulative on Achievement, Attitude, and Journal Writing of Elementary Science Students.  Annual Meeting of the Mid South Educational Research Association (pp. 1-18).  New Orleans: University of South Alabama.  Retrieved November 17, 2016

  50. ¨Chromosertops meiosis¨: A Simple Two Phase Exercise to Represent the Connection between Meiosis & Increased Genetic Diversity,  The American Biology Teacher.  April 2014.  Vol 76  No, 1  pp. 53-56. Dorit Eliyahu
  51. Early years teachers' late concerns and perceived needs in science: an exploratory study.  European Journal of Teacher Education. June 2004. Vol 27, No. 2.  Maria Kallery

  52. Every Day is National Lab Day.  ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education) 2010.  Glen Bull.

  53. Vocabulary and Content Learning in Grade 9 Earth Science: Effects of Vocabulary Preteaching, Rational Cloze Task, and Reading Comprehension Task.  The Calestol Journal.  California State University, Fresno.  pp. 1-28.  Siok H. Lee.

  54. Improving Science and Vocabulary Learning of English Language Learners.  ICREATE Brief.  August 2010.  pp. 1-8.  Diane August, Lauren Artzi, and Julie Mazrum, Center for Applied Linguistics.

  55. El rastro digital.  Interesante. Universidad Interamericana de Puerto Rico.  2014 Vol 4. Michael A. Colón Rodríguez.

  56. El uso de analogías para el ¨aprendizaje sustentable¨: El caso de la enseñanza de los niveles de organización en sistemas biológicos y sus propiedades emergentes.  Revista Electrónica de Investigación en Educación en Ciencias.  Año 4 (1) pp.10-33.  Lydia R. Galagovsky y Marcela Greco.

  57. Students´ Satisfaction Toward the Services of the Chemical Laboratory.  International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education Vol 4 No. 1 March 2015, pp. 22-29.  ISNN 2252-8822.  Astin Lukum, Yoseph Paramata

  58. Who's Helped by Help-Sessions in Introductory Science Courses?  The American Biology Teacher, May 2008.  vol 50 (5).  pp. 269-270.  Randy Moore.

  59.  Teaching Oral Communication in Undergraduate Science: Are we doing enough and doing it right?  Journal of Learning Design, 2011. Vol 4(3) p. 71-70.  Vincent Chan.

  60. Diseño y métodos cuasiexperimentales. Unicef: Office of Research-Innocenti.  Sintesis metodológicas Sinopsis de la Evaluación de Impacto 2002 No 8.  Howard White y Shagun Sabarwal.

  61. Report to the President Prepare and Inspire: K-12 Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) for America´s Future.  2010. PCAST. Department of Education.  Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President of the United States. Recuperado el 20 de enero de 2016 de http;//www/whitehouse.gov/ostp/pcast.  Holdren, J.P., Lander, E. & Varmus, H.
  62. Engaging Students in the Scientific Practices of Explanation and Argumentation: Understanding A Framework for K-12 Science Education.  Science and Children April/Mary 2012 p. 1-6.  Brian J. Reiser, Leena K. Berland and Lisa Kenyon.
  63. A picture is worth a thousand words a personal view of using images in the teaching of the biological sciences.  Routledge  Bioscience Education.  vol. 1 no. 1.  Gordon Beakes. p. 1-15.  
  64. Ingunn Skalstad & Eli Munkebye (2021) Young children’s questions about science topics when situated in a natural outdoor environment: a qualitative study from kindergarten and primary school, International Journal of Science Education, 43:7, 1017-1035, DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2021.1895451 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1895451 
  65. Planning Instruction to Meet the Intent of the Next Generation Science Standards.  Journal of Science Teacher Education. Vol 25 (2) pp. 157/ 175. Routledge.  Joseph Krajcik, Susan Codere, Chanyah Dahsah, Renee Bayer & Kongju Mun.  ISSN: 1046-560 X online.
  66. Writing-to-Learn, Writing-to-Communicate, & Scientific Literacy.  The American Biology Teacher March 2013, Vol 75  No. 3 pp. 170-175.  Mena Balgopal, Alison Wallace.
  67. Creswell, John W. (1994).  Diseño de Investigación.  Aproximaciones cualitativas y cuantitativas. Sage.  Cap 9: El procedimiento cualitativa, pp. 1743-171
  68. ¿Sería la Autoeficacia una Variable Influyente en los Alumnos de Ciencia del Trabajo?.  International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology.  INFAD Revista de Psicología. 2012.  No. 1 Vol. 4.  ISSN 0214-9877.  Susana Sánchez Herrera, Mercedes Gómez Acuñas. María Gordillo Gordillo, Virgilio García Aparicio, Celedonio Pérez de las Vacas.
  69. El método colaborativo como una alternativa en el trabajo experimental de Química Orgánica.  Educación Química. Octubre 2014.  25 (4) p. 464-469.  Francisca Ofelia Muñiz-Osuna, Karla Lizbeth Arvayo-Mata, Carmen Alicia Villegas-Osuna, Francisco Humberto González-Gutierrez. Oscar Alberto Sosa-Pérez.  ISSN 0187-893-X
  70. The Effect of Reflective Science Journal Writing on Students´ Self-Regulated Learning Strategies.  International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2015, 10 (3), 367-379.  Nawar M. Al-Rawahi, Sulaiman M. Al-Balushi. ISSN: 1306-3065
  71. Validez y Confiabilidad en la Investigación Cualitativa.  Revista de Postgrado FaCE-UC Vol 11. No 21 Julio/Diciembre 2017. pp 352-357. ISSN 2443-4442. Jorge Javier Plaza Guzmán, Patricia Alexandra Uriguen Aguirre, Holger Fabrizzio Bajarano Copo.  Aprobado 25/8/2017.
  72. Exercises for Bringing the Hypothetico-Deductive Method to Life.  The American Biology Teacher. Vol 76.  No. 5 May 2014.  p.345-348. H. Charles Romesburg.
  73. Too Many Words, Too Little Support: Vocabulary Instruction in Online Earth Science Courses. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies. Vol. 13. Issue 2. April-June 2018. Retrieved on December 3, 2019. p. 46-61 Mary F. Rice. Donald D. Deshler.
  74. Effectiveness of a highly rated science curriculum unit for students with disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children. Winter 2007. Vol 73. No. 2, pp. 202-223. Sharon Lynch, Juliana Taymans, William A. Watson, Robert J. Ochsendorf, Curtis Pike, Michael J. Szesze.
  75. Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs) as a Bridge Between Engineering Education Research and Mathematics Education Research. Advance in Engineering Education.  Summer 2008. p. 1-25.  Eric Hamilton, Richard Lesh, Frank Lester, Michael Brillesskyper.
  76. Bringing Research on Learning and Student Achievement: The Role of Instructional Materials.  Recuperado el 20 de enero de 2014. Joseph A. Taylor, Pamela Van Scotter, Doug Coulson.
  77. Observational Journals: An Aid to Sky Watching. A Stellar Excercise-Predicting Event in the Sky.  JCST February 2000. Vol XXIX # 4 p. 245-254.  Philip M. Sadler, Doug Haller, Eliza Garfield.
  78. The advantage of mixing examples in inductive learning: a comparison of three hypotheses. Educational Psychology.  2017 ISSN 1469-5820  Vol 37  No. 4 p. 421-437.  Francisco Javier Guzman Muñoz
  79. Homestudy Assignments: An Experiments in Promoting Active Learning in Introductory Chemistry: Preparing Students for Today´s Cooperative Work Environment.  JCST February 1997 p. 281-282.  John T. Frey
  80. Describing Connections between Science Content and Future Careers: Implementing Texas Curriculum for Rural At-Risk High School Students Using Purposefully-Designed Field Trips.  Rural Educator Fall 2011 Vol 33 No. 1. p. 37-47.  Tommye Hutson, Susan Cooper, Tony Talbert.
  81. Validation of a Paper and Pencil Test Instrument Measuring Biology Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge by Using Think-Aloud Interviews.  Journal of Education and Training Studies.  October 2013. Vol 1 No. 2  p. 113-126.  E-ISSN 2324-8068.  Melanie Jüttner & Brigit Jana Neuhaus.
  82. Student Agency in Science Learning: Multimodal and Multilingual Strategies and Practices among Recently Arrived Students in Upper Secondary School in Sweden.  International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education.  September 2019, Vol 12 issue 1, pp. 67-74
  83. Models and Modeling.  Annual Meeting of the North America Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. (24th, Athens, GA, October 26-29, 2002) Vol 1-4.  Richard Lesh, Guadalupe Carmona, Thomas Post.
  84. The Nature of Student Thinking in Life Science Laboratories.  School Science and Mathematics.  January 1997. Vol 91 (1) p. 37-44.  Daniel P. Shepardson.
  85. A reappraisal of the status of Introductory Biology Laboratory Education in U.S. College and Universities. The American Biology Teachers, vol 67, No 9.  November/ December 2005. p, 525-529. Marshall D. Sunderberg, Joseph E. Armstrong, E. William Wischusen.  
  86. Laboratorio. (2010).  Diccionario de las Ciencias de la Educación. (2do. ed.. p. 689-690. Barcelona, España: CSS.  Recuperado el 14 de abril de 2016, de http://www/editorial.ccs.
  87. Laboratory in Science Education Understanding the History and Nature of Science. 2004. Arizona State University.  Arizona: Center for Biology and Society.  https:// cbs. asu. edu/ sites/ default/ files/ people/profile/pdf/ 3LaboratoriesinScienceEducation.pdf.  Recuperado el 25 de febrero de 2016.  J. Maienschein.
  88. Cómo desean trabajar los alumnos en el laboratorio de biología: Un acercamiento a las propuestas didácticas actuales.  Revista Iberoamericana de Educación,  25 de mayo de 2007  Vol 42(7), p. 1-3.  Recuperado el 10 de marzo de 2016.  http://rieoei.org/deloslectores/1741Alvarez.pdf.  S. Maris Alvarez.
  89. The Influence of Hands-on Physics Experiments on Scientific Process Skills According to Prospective Teachers' Experiences.  European Journal of Physics, 4 (1), pp. 1-9.  Recuperado el 23 de marzo de 2016.  N. Hurca.
  90. Journalism as a Path to Scientific Literacy: Helping Students Connect Important Science Concepts with Real World Issues at New York´s Baruch College.  JCST.  September/October. 1998 p. 29-32.  Christopher Hallowell & Mary Jean Holland.
  91.  Teaching Oral Communication in Undergraduate Science: Are we doing enough and doing it right?  Journal of Learning Design, 2011. Vol 4(3) p. 71-70.  Vincent Chan.

  92. Diseño y métodos cuasiexperimentales. Unicef: Office of Research-Innocenti.  Sintesis metodológicas Sinopsis de la Evaluación de Impacto 2002 No 8.  Howard White y Shagun Sabarwal.

  93. Prepare and Inspire: K-12 Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) for America´s Future.  Report to the President.  Executive Office of the President, President´s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.  September 2010.

  94. H.R. 2653. The STEM Opportunities Act of 2017. 115Th Congress 1st Session

  95. Beyond the Five Paragraph Essay. ASCD. April 2014 71 (7) Kimberly Hill Campbell. www.ASCD.org

  96. A multiple self-theory of the mind.  Comprehensive Psychology 2012. Vol 1 Article 5.  ISSN 2165-2228. David Lester

  97. Dynamic Assessment. Encyclopedia of Educational Research. 1992. 6th Ed. Marvin C. Alkin (Ed. chief) vol 1. Macmillian Publishing Company. NY. Sponsored. American Educational Research Association. By Annemarie Sullivan Palinesar and Judith Winn

  98. A Developmental Model of Critical Thinking. Educational Research  March 1999 p.16-25.  Recuperado January 22, 2018.  Deanna Kuhn

  99. A Coin-Flipping Analogy and Web App for Teaching Spin-Spin Splitting in 1H NMR Spectroscopy.  Journal of Chemical Education. August 2016, 93, 1478-1482. Adam M. Azman and John J. Esteb. DOI 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00133

  100. The Effect of Combining Analogy-Based Simulation and Laboratory Activities on Turkish Elementary School Students´ Understanding of Simple Electric Circuit.  The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-October 2011, vol 10 (4).  Zeynep Koyunlu Ünlu, Íbilge Dükme,

  101.  Ensuring Meaningful Access to the Science Curriculum for Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities.  Teaching Exceptional Children.  July/Aug 2012.  Vol 44(6) p.17-25.  Bridget Miller.

  102. Generation of Spontaneous Analogies by Students Solving Science Problems.  International Conference on Thinking (3rd, Honolulu, HI, January 4-8, 1987). Clement, John.

  103. Reinforcement of Science Learning through Local Culture: A Delphi Study.  Prasart Nuangehalerm.  p. 414-416.

  104. The Science of Thinking and Science for Thinking: A Description of Cognitive Acceleration Through Science (1999).  Aday, P.

  105. Concept Maps & Vee Diagrams as Tools for Learning New Mathematics Topics. Proc of the First Int. Conference on Concept Mapping (2004) p. 1-8. Pamplona.  Afamasag-Fuatai, K.

  106. La controversia científica un fundamento conceptual y metodología en al información inicial del docente: una propuesta de enseñanza para la apropiación de habilidades argumentativas. Revista Enseñanza Educativa. 2015.  Teo Pabón, Liz Muñoz, Jordi Vallverdú. Doi 10.106/j. eq. 2005. 5007

  107. Mayne, L.ynne (2012).  Reflective Writing as a Tool for Assessing Teamwork in Bioscience.  Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 40 (4), p. 234-240.

  108. Towndrow, P., Ali Kink, T., & Venthan, A. (2008). Promoting Inquiry Through Science Reflective Journal Writing.  Eurasian Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education, 4(3), 279-283

  109. Stencel, J. E (1998, March/April).  An Interactive Lecture Notebook-Twelve Ways to Improve Students' Grades. JCST, 343-345.

  110. Rice, R. E. (1998, February).  ‘Scientific Writing’ A Course to Improve the Writing of Science Students. JCST. 267-271..

  111. Análisis de las prácticas de laboratorio realizadas en Instituto de Enseñanza Secundaria. Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales y Sociales. 1996, 10 p. 99-112 Duque Rodríguez de Arellano, L, Jimenez Plaza, S, Cuerva Moreno, J.

  112. Sustainable Equity: Avoiding the Pendulum Effect in the Life Sciences. Impact of Undergraduate Science Course Innovations on Learning Science 331. No. 6022 (2011) pp. 1269-1270. Tatiana C Tatum Parker and Rebecca Rosenthal

  113. Choosing Primary Literature in Biology to Achueve Specific Educational Goals. JCST February 2000 p. 255-260 Susan Bandoni Muench

  114. Las matemáticas de la biodiversidad. Investigación y Ciencia  Octubre 2003 p. 54-55. Jordi Bascompte

  115. Diagramas V y Aprendizaje Significativo. Revista Chilena de Educación Científica 2007 Vol 6 No. 2 Instituto de Física de UFRGS, Brasil.  Marco Antonio Moreira

  116. The Availability and Use of Science Laboratories at Secondary Education Level.  I-manager´s Journal on School Educational Technology, September 2011 Vol 7 No, 2  p- 46-50 T.J. M. S Raju and N.V.S. Suryanarayana

  117. What do Students´ Behaviors and Performances in Lab Tell Us About Their Behavior and Performances in Lecture-Portions of Introductory Biology Courses?  Bioscene March 2007 Vol 33 No. 1 p. 19-24.  Randy Moore

  118. The Effect of Guided-Inquiry Laboratory Experiments on Science Education Students´ Chemistry Laboratory Attitudes, Anxiety and Achievement.  Journal of Education and Trainning Studies. April 2016 Vol 4, No, 4  p. 217- 227 ISSN 2324-805XE  Evrim Ural

  119. Teaching Biology with Extended Analogies The American Biology Teacher August 2016 Vol 78 No. 6. p. 512-514 Richard D. Gardner.

  120. An Interview with Anton E. Lawson. The American Biology Teacher, vol 67 No. 3, March 2005.  Liberato Cardellini

  121. Valoración de los modelos más usados en la enseñanza de las ciencias basado en la analogía ¨El alumno como científico¨ Enseñanza de las ciencias, 2011, vol 29 (1) p, 35-46.  María Martínez y Cárdenas Salgado, Fidel Antonio

  122. Analogía, un modelo alternativo Crítica al modelo estándar de solución de problemas por analogía y propuesta de un modelo alternativo.  Psicología, Cultura y Sociedad, Año 1 No. 1. p. 61-86 Ricardo A. Minervino y Juan Fernando Adrover

  123. Pensamiento Analógico y Construcción de un Modelo Molecular para la Materia.  Revista Eureka Enseñanza Divulgación Científica 2007, vol 4 (1) pp. 21-41. J. Ma. Oliva, Ma, M Aragón.

  124. Que conocimientos profesionales deberíamos tener los profesores de ciencias sobre el uso de analogíasRevista Eureka Enseñanza Divulgación Científica 2008, vol 5 (1) pp. 15-28. J. Ma Oliva

  125. Modelo Analógico para Enseñar Biotecnología: Una Experiencia en el Aula. Paradigma, Vol XXX, No 2, Diciembre de 2009, p. 203-215.  Virgina M. Rengifo V, Yolanda Fariña de Lander, Eva Cabrera de Reyes.

  126.   Eye Movements Reveal Optimal Strategies for Analogical Reasoning.  Frontiers in Psychology June 2017 vol 8 Article 932 p. 1-9.  Michael S. Vendetti, Ariel Starr, Elizabeth L. Johnson, Kiana Modavi and Silvia A. Bunge.

  127. Use of analogy in learning physics: The role of representations.  Physics Education Research 2. 020101 (2006). pp.1-10.  Noah S. Podolefsky and Noha D. Finkelstein

  128. On the Analogy between Cognitive Representation and Truth. Theoria 55 (2006) pp. 39-48. Mauricio Suárez y Albert Solé

  129. Convergent and Divergent Thinking in Verbal AnalogyThinking and Reasoning. April 2015. p. 1-31 doi:10.1080/13546783.2015.1036120.  Jones, LL. y Estes, Z. 

  130. Rule, A. C (2015) Inventing Through Form and Function AnalogyIowa: Center for Educational Transformation.

  131. Rule, A.C. y Furletti, C (2004).  Using form and Function Analogy Objects Boxer to Teach Human Body Systems.  School Science and Mathematics, 104 (4), p. 155-169.

  132. Veloo, A., Rani, M. A & Hariharan, K. (2015, December).  The Role of Gender in the Use of Metacognitive Awareness Reading Strategies Among Biology Students. Asian Social Science, 11 (1). doi: 10.5539-ass.v11n1-67

  133. Vogelaar, B., Bakker, M. , Hoogeveen,L. & Resing, W.C (2017). Dynamic testing of gifted and average-ability children's analogy problem solving: Does executive functioning play a role?  Psychology Schools (54), 837-851. doi 10.1002/pts.22032

Psychology in Education



  1. Including the Learner in Personalize Learning. www. Centeril.org.  Jim Richabaugh

  2. Déficit de atención e Inteligencia.  Santiago 2005  Vol 108.  pp. 412-433.  Recuperado el 6 de enero de 2014.  Lilia Susana Carmona García.

  3. Investigation of Teachers´ Verbal and Non-Verbal Strategies for Managing Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder (ADHD) Students´ Behaviours within a Classroom Environment.  Australian Journal of Teacher Education. Gretchen Geng.

  4.  Efectividad de una Estrategia Conductual para el Manejo de la Agresividad en Escolares de Enseñanza Básica.  PSYKHE 2005 VOL14 No. 2 p, 35-42. ISSN 0717-0297.  Veronia Pérez, Jorge Rodríguez, Ana María Fernández y Flora De la Barra.

  5. Microdesarrollo de la interacción entre pares y el razonamiento científico en niños pequeños.  Infancia y Aprendizaje. 2016 Vol 39 No.4  p.747-771.  Marleng Guevara Guerrero, K. Marijn Van Di, Paul Van Greet.

  6. Student Conceptions of Peer-Assisted Learning.  Journal of Further and Higher Education, 2015  Vol 39, No. 4.  pp. 579-597.  Yvonne Hodgson, Robyn Benson and Charlotte Brack.

  7.  Time with Peers From Middle Childhood to Late Adolescence: Development Course and Adjustment Correlates.  Child Development. July/August 2014.  Vol 85. No. 4. p. 1677-1693.  DOI: 10.1111/cdev. 12235.  Chun Bun Lam, Susan M. McHale, Ann C. Crouter.

  8. Task Team Development as an Alternative in Graduate Education. Forming the group.  American Psychiatric Association; 25-28 September 1972, Honolulu, Hawaii. pp. 1-3 Maria Nemeth

  9. Summing Up and Future Plans. Forming the group.  American Psychiatric Association; 25-28 September 1972, Honolulu, Hawaii. pp. 1-3 Charles Hanson.

  10. Assessing our Program and Changes in The Student's Counseling Skills. Forming the group.  American Psychiatric Association; 25-28 September 1972, Honolulu, Hawaii. pp. 1-4 John H. Simpson.

  11. The Model We Used To Treat Peer Counselors. Forming the group.  American Psychiatric Association; 25-28 September 1972, Honolulu, Hawaii. pp. 1-3 Susan Price.

  12.  Forming the group.  American Psychiatric Association; 25-28 September 1972, Honolulu, Hawaii. pp. 1-2 Toke Hoppenbrouwers.

  13. The Experimental Course; Principles of the Counseling Relationship. American Psychiatric Association; 25-28 September 1972, Honolulu, Hawaii. pp. 1-2 Aaron Hass.

  14. Tutoría entre iguales: método antiguo, nuevos avances.  Infancia y aprendizaje. 2015 Vol 38 No 1 pp. 14-29.  K. Topping.

  15. Condiciones y capacidades de los educadores de adultos mayores: la visión de los participantes.  Revista Argentina de Sociología, SCIELO. Mayo/Junio 2008 Vol 6 No. 10 p. 1-8. ISSN 1669-3248.  Dr. Alberto Yuni y Claudio Ariel Urbano.

  16. Exploring the effects of group testing on graduate students´ motivation and achievement.  Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.  Vol 32, No. 2, April 2007, pp. 215-227.  ISSN 0260-2938.  Dawson R. Hancock

  17. Just Go To Sleep!  Sleep & Learning.  The American Biology Teacher,  January 2014.  Vol 76  No. 1 p.57-58.  ISSN 0002-7685.  Jenny L. Williamson, Helen T. Buckland, Susana L. Cunningham.

  18. A New Twist on Vocabulary Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities in BIology.  The American Biology Teacher.  April 2013.  Vol 75  No, 4  pp. 264-267.  Kelly J. Grillo, Lisa A. Dieker.

  19. Incidencia de las metas académicas del alumnado de secundaria en su gestión motivacional.  Aula Abierta 2006. vol  44  pp. 83-90.  Iris Estevez, Susana Rodriguez, Antonio Valle, Bibiana Regueiro e Isabel Piñeiro.

  20.  Presence, Proximity, and Peer Interactions of Adolescents With Severe Disabilities in General Education Classrooms.  Exceptional Children 2016.  Vol 82 (2) pp. 192-208.  Rebecca Feldman, Erick W. Carter, Jennifer Asmus and Mathew E. Brock.  DOI: 10.1177/00144029155854981.

  21. Investigation of Teachers´ Verbal and Non-Verbal Strategies for Managing Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Student's Behavior Within a Classroom Environment.  Australian Journal of Teacher Education.  Geng, G.

  22. The Effect of Environmental Accommodations on Attending Behavior of an ADHD Chapter 1 Student: An Action Research Study.  American Educational Research Association, April 1996.  2 (11).  Greenwald, M. I. 

  23. Gibson, K.J (1999).  How to Increase the Participation of Women and Minorities in Science.  Master's Mathematics, Science, and Technology Educators/Research of the Ohio States University Proceeding of the Annual Spring Conference.  p. 50-53-  Recuperado el 27 de febrero de 2016.
  24. Physics and Everyday Life-New Modules to Motivate Students.  US-China Education Review A, February 2013 3 (2), 114-118.  Recuperado el 16 de febrero de 2016.  Holubova, R.
  25. Motivación. 2000 Encyclopedia of Psychology Vol 5 p. 314-324. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press.  L.A. King and R. A. Emmons 
  26. What factors affect the attitude Toward Women in Science Held by High School Biology Students.  School Science and Mathematics, February 97 (2). p. 78-86. J. Mc Carty Terry & W. W. Baird.
  27. The motivations to study and expectations of studying of undergraduate students in business and management.  Journal of Further and Higher Education.  Vol 35, No. 4, November 2011, 521-543. Andy Adcroft.
  28. A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding Profiles of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations.  The Elementary School Journal.  Vol 116, Number 3. March 2016.  p.365-389.  Jennifer Henderlong Corpus, Stephanie V. Wormington, Kyla H
  29. Características de los preescolares con depresión y con anhedonía o sin ella: pruebas de un subtipo de depresión melancólica en niños pequeños.  Am J Psychiatry (Ed Esp) 2005; 8: 104-110. Joan L. Luby, Christine Mrakotsky, Amy Heffelfinger, Kathy Brown, Edward Spitznagel.
  30. Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance.  Journal of Educational Psychology, 1990. Vol 82. No,.1 pp. 33-40.  Paul R. Pintrich and Elisabeth V. de Groot.
  31. The Effect of Student Reflection on Academic Performance and Motivation.  SAGE, Special Collection-Student Diversty.  July-September 2017: 1-13.  Derek Cavilla.
  32. Geng. G (n.d.) Investigation of Teachers ́ Verbal and Non-Verbal Strategies for Managing Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Students ́ Behavior within a Classroom Environment. Australian Journal of Teacher Education.
  33. Greenewald, M.J. (April 96). In research; The Effect of Environmental Accommodations on Attending Behavior of an ADHD. Chapter 1 Student; An Action Research Study. American Educational Research Association, p, 2-11.
  34. Exploring the effects of group testing on graduate students ́ motivation and achievement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Vol 32. No. 2 April 2007, pp. 215-227. ISSN 0260-2938 Dawson R. Hancock.
  35. Bringing evidence-based self-directed intervention practices to the trenches for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Preventing School Failure. Summer 2009. Vol 53, No. 4. p. 253-266. Michael Fitzpatrick and Earle Knowlton.
  36. Neuropsychological Functioning in Specific Learning Disorders-Reading, Writing, and Mixed Groups. J Indian Assoc, Child Adolesc. Ment Health 2006.: vol 2 No. 4: p. 112-115. Kohli D, Mohsome Man, Malhotra Savit
  37. Socio-cognitive skills in children with disruptive behaviors and victims of abuse. Univ Psychol, Bogota Colombia. May-August 2008. Vol 7 No. 2. ISSN 1657-9267 pp.357-367.
  38. The Effect of Environmental Accommodations on Attending Behavior of an ADHD Chapter I Student: An Action Research Study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (77th, New York, NY, April 8-12, 1996). M. Jane Greenwald;  Cheryl Walsh
  39. Introduction: Paul R. Pintrich´s Contributions to Educational Psychology: An Enduring Legacy.  Educational Psychologist. 2005. 40 (2), 67-74.  Allan Wigfield, Akane Zusho, Elisabeth V. De Groot.
  40. The experimental Synthesis of behavior.  International Journal of Psychology, 2006, 41 (6), p. 462-467. Recuperado el 11 de enero de 2014.  Rubén Ardilla.
  41. Gravedad e Importancia de los Comportamientos de Indisciplina.  Causa y Fatores Asociados a Ciertas Conductas: Una Revisión de Diferentes Estudios.  Psicología Educativa, 2005, Vol 11 No 2 págs, 65-78. ISSN 1135-755. M. Del Mar Badia Martín.
  42. Más allá de lo académico: un proceso educativo que valore la dignidad y las potencialidades del ciudadano. El Sol, Revista de la Asociación del Maestro de Puerto Rico. 2012 No. 3 p. 3-9.  Junta Editora: Ana Helvia Quintero, Victor Hernández Rivera, Hna Iris Rivera Cintrón, Eloy A. Ruiz-Rivera y José Luis Vargas.
  43. Las barreras emocionales en el aprendizje del inglés: el caso de los estudiantes de Administración de Empresas.  El Sol, Revista de la Asociación del Maestro de Puerto Rico. 2012 No. 3.  p.10-14.  Anamari Irizarry Quintero.
  44. Balance personal con mejor capacitación física. El Sol, Revista de la Asociación del Maestro de Puerto Rico. 2012 No. 3 p. 15-21.  Farah A. Rampirez Marrero.
  45. Tratamiento del trastorno de oposición desafiante.  Revista Neurol 2006, 42 (Supl 2) p. 583-588.  E. Rigau-Ratera, C. García-Nonell, J. Artigas-Pallarés.
  46. A Unique Challenge: the Difference Between Giftedness and Asperger´s DisorderGifted Child Today.  Fall 2009.  Vol 32 No. 4 p. 57-60.  Edward R. Amend, Patricia Schuler, Kathleen Beaver-Gavin, and Rebecca Beights.
  47. Neuropsychologic Teal Functioning in Specific Learning Disorders- Reading, Writing and Mixed Groups.  J. Indian Assoc. Child Adolesc. Ment Health 2006; 2 (4): 112-115.  Adarsh Kohli, Manreet Kaur, Manju Mohanty, Savita Malhotra.  

  48. Effect of alternating posture on cognitive performance for healthy people performing sedentary work.  Ergonomics. 2017. ISSN ONLINE: 1366-5487.  Bernard Schwartz, Jay M. Kapellusch, Andre Schrempf, Kathrin Probst, Michael Haller & Arnold Baca.

  49. Student and School-Level Factor Related to School Belongingness Among High School Students.  International Journal of Adolescence and Youth.  March 2020 Vol 25  No. 1 pp. 741-752.  Scheila Ahmadi, Mohamad Hassani. Farid Ahmadi.

  50. A Case Study of Staff and Student Satisfaction With Assessment Feedback at a Small Specialised Higher Education Institution.  Journal of Further and Higher Education, 2014 Vol 18  No. 1, pp. 1-18  Lindsey A. Maggs

  51. Quality of Life Theory III. Maslow Revisited.  The Scientific World Journal 2003. Vol. 3. pp. 1050-1057.  ISSN 1537-744Z.  Soren Ventegodt, Joav Merrick, Niels Jorgen Andersen.

  52. Self-actualization and Beyond.  Proceedings of the Conference on the Training of Counselors of Adults.  May 22-28, 1965.  pp. 108-131 Chatham, Massachusetts.  Sponsored by The New England Board of Higher Education.  By Abraham Maslow